Event

Prague: Eduardo Ribeiro vs Andrew Paulson

3 signals across 1 market · $13,972 tracked · resolves Aug 23, 2026

Follow the Polymarket prediction market for Eduardo Ribeiro vs Andrew Paulson in Prague qualifying. The event tracks which player advances, with $5,659 in smart money monitored and a recent bettor scaling into Paulson.

Markets (1)

  1. Prague: Eduardo Ribeiro vs Andrew Paulson3 signals · $13,972 tracked

Top trades across all markets

  1. 99% win-rate tennis bettor

    A highly proven bettor with a 99% win rate and substantial positive edge is taking Eduardo Ribeiro at near-even odds.

    $3,825Wallet win rate: 99%Score: 5.4
  2. Bettor scaling into Paulson

    A serial cross-market bettor is adding $5.7K to an already $31.5K Andrew Paulson position amid an 84x volume spike, though the historical edge is only moderate.

    $4,488Wallet win rate: 67%Score: 3.0
  3. Bettor scaling into Paulson

    A serial cross-market bettor is adding $5.7K to an already $31.5K Andrew Paulson position amid an 84x volume spike, though the historical edge is only moderate.

    $5,659Wallet win rate: 67%Score: 3.0

Top wallets in this event

  1. 0xad89f8f6e1$10,147 · 1 market · 2 alerts · 67% wins
  2. 0xc3c3b3eec8$3,825 · 1 market · 1 alert · 99% wins

More on this event

FAQs

What are the Prague tennis prediction-market odds?

The live odds for Eduardo Ribeiro vs Andrew Paulson are available on the PolySpotter event page and reflect the market's current assessment of which player will advance.

What is the smart money doing in Ribeiro vs Paulson?

PolySpotter has tracked $5,659 in smart money across this event. The latest alert reports a bettor scaling into Andrew Paulson.

What outcomes are traded in this Polymarket event?

The market covers the two possible match outcomes: Eduardo Ribeiro advances or Andrew Paulson advances.

When does the Ribeiro vs Paulson market resolve?

The match is scheduled for August 16, 2026, at 5:10 AM ET in Prague qualifying, with the market resolving by August 23, 2026, subject to its stated settlement rules.