Event

HSBC Championships, Qualification: Maddison Inglis vs Alycia Parks

8 signals across 1 market · $29,495 tracked · resolves Jun 13, 2026

This HSBC Championships qualification event tracks the prediction market for Maddison Inglis vs Alycia Parks, with traders betting on which player will advance. PolySpotter has flagged $1,365 in smart money activity, including a profitable bettor entering a thin market, making the odds worth monitoring closely as match time approaches.

Markets (1)

  1. HSBC Championships, Qualification: Maddison Inglis vs Alycia Parks8 signals · $29,495 tracked

Top trades across all markets

  1. Sharp funded tennis cluster

    Strong tennis signal from a funded wallet cluster that includes a 93% winner and a very large profitable serial sports trader all buying Alycia Parks.

    $6,259Score: 20.1
  2. 92% sports sharp buying Parks

    A proven 92% win-rate sports bettor put $10.3k on Alycia Parks amid a major pre-event volume spike.

    $10,264Wallet win rate: 94%Score: 12.2
  3. 9-wallet funded cluster

    A known 9-wallet funded cluster is backing Alycia Parks with a modest but coordinated-looking tennis bet, and the wallet has positive lifetime P&L despite only a 51% win rate.

    $2,677Wallet win rate: 51%Score: 9.0
  4. 93% winner backs Parks

    Proven sharp sports bettor with a 93% win rate and $377k profit is buying Alycia Parks at 68%.

    $2,453Wallet win rate: 95%Score: 8.0
  5. Profitable sports whale

    A highly profitable high-volume tennis trader bought Alycia Parks, though the alert itself is only a weak cross-market signal and the price has moved against them slightly.

    $3,349Wallet win rate: 55%Score: 6.9
  6. Profitable serial sports bettor

    A highly profitable serial cross-market sports bettor bought Alycia Parks, making the wallet track record the main signal despite modest trade size.

    $1,129Wallet win rate: 63%Score: 3.0
  7. Profitable serial tennis bettor

    Profitable serial sports bettor with 433 resolved bets is buying Alycia Parks at 68¢, though the signal is moderate rather than exceptional.

    $2,000Wallet win rate: 65%Score: 3.0
  8. Profitable bettor in thin market

    A profitable high-volume sports bettor bought Maddison Inglis at 34¢ in a very quiet tennis market, with the bet over 2x the market’s 24h volume.

    $1,365Wallet win rate: 69%Score: 1.1

Top wallets in this event

  1. 0x8a6764e403$10,264 · 1 market · 1 alert · 94% wins
  2. 0x2005d175ea$3,349 · 1 market · 1 alert · 55% wins
  3. 0x3d2a3dee9a$2,677 · 1 market · 1 alert · 51% wins
  4. 0x594d0c059d$2,453 · 1 market · 1 alert · 95% wins
  5. 0x9dfed1a5d6$2,000 · 1 market · 1 alert · 65% wins
  6. 0x5caec2a00a$1,365 · 1 market · 1 alert · 69% wins
  7. 0xfe787d0319$1,129 · 1 market · 1 alert · 63% wins

More on this event

FAQs

What are the Inglis vs Parks odds on Polymarket?

The event market reflects the current prediction-market odds for whether Maddison Inglis or Alycia Parks advances in their HSBC Championships qualification match. Prices can move as traders react to lineup news, form, and betting activity.

What is the smart money doing on Inglis vs Parks?

PolySpotter has tracked $1,365 in smart money across this event, with a recent alert noting a profitable bettor in a thin market. In smaller tennis markets, even one strong trader can meaningfully affect prices.

What outcomes are being traded in this event?

Traders are betting on the match winner: Maddison Inglis to advance or Alycia Parks to advance. The market resolves based on which player wins the match and moves on in qualification.

When does the Inglis vs Parks market resolve?

The market is scheduled to resolve after the match result is known, with a listed resolution deadline of June 13, 2026 at 11:40 UTC if needed.

Why watch smart money for this tennis prediction market?

Tennis qualification markets can be relatively thin, so sharp or profitable bettors may have an outsized impact on prices. Tracking smart money helps show whether the odds are moving because of informed action rather than random liquidity.