Will Girona FC win on 2026-05-23?

16 smart money signals detected, totaling $352,248.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, La Liga

Notable Trades

Sharp bettor buying the dip

Sharp wallet with an 83% win record and +$28k P&L bought Girona Yes after a major price drop, making this a copy-worthy contrarian entry.

This bettor wins 83% of resolved bets and is up $28,055 lifetime.
They bought Girona at 19¢ after Yes fell sharply from its prior 49–57¢ range.
Entry at 19¢ implies a high-upside contrarian bet if the selloff is overdone.

$2,864 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 87%

Profitable new whale near resolution

A repeat-flagged new wallet with $1.28M profit led a $156K one-sided Yes push minutes before resolution, alongside a 60x volume spike.

A new wallet already up $1.28M led this bet with over $150K on Yes.
Three wallets all bought the same side, creating a $156K one-sided push.
The buying came minutes before resolution during a 60x volume spike, suggesting high-conviction live positioning.

$155,871 on Yes

Profitable last-minute sports bettor

A highly profitable serial last-minute sports bettor bought Girona No seconds before resolution amid a major volume spike.

This bettor is up $369k lifetime and specializes in near-resolution bets.
They placed this $5k No bet just 19 seconds before the scheduled close.
Market volume spiked 61x versus normal, adding momentum to the late move.

$5,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 60%

98% winner live-sport timer

Elite sports bettor with a 98% record and $502k profit bought Girona No within minutes of resolution during a major volume spike.

This bettor has won 47 of 48 resolved trades and is up $502,792 lifetime.
They bought No within minutes of resolution, a timing pattern that can matter in live sports markets.
The market saw a 60x volume spike, and their 45–46¢ entry is already trading around 48¢.

$3,899 on No | Wallet win rate: 97%

Profitable new live-sports whale

A 10-day-old wallet with $1.28M profit made a $150K live bet on Girona Yes minutes before resolution amid a major volume spike.

This 10-day-old bettor is already up $1.28M and has repeatedly placed large flagged bets.
They bought $150K of Yes at 54–55¢ within five minutes of resolution, including $78.6K in the final 90 seconds.
Market volume spiked 117x versus normal, suggesting a burst of late conviction around this outcome.

$150,197 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 100%

98% winner buying No

Sharp sports bettor with a 46/47 resolved record and nearly $500k profit is buying Girona No at 47¢.

This bettor has won 46 of 47 resolved positions and is up about $500k lifetime.
Their average winning entry was 45¢, suggesting a strong history of finding mispriced sports bets.
Buying No at 47¢ goes against Girona's slight market favorite status, implying they see value on Girona not winning.

$1,202 on No | Wallet win rate: 97%

91% winner buying No

A highly profitable sports bettor with a 91% record and strong cross-market history bought No on Girona despite the market leaning slightly Yes.

This bettor wins 91% of resolved trades and is up about $653k lifetime.
They have a long cross-market record across 26 events, with the same 91% hit rate.
Entry at 47¢ on No implies they see Girona failing to win as underpriced.

$1,500 on No | Wallet win rate: 92%

Perfect-record sports bettor

Sharp sports bettor with a perfect 36/36 resolved record and $101,767 profit is buying Girona not to win at 47¢.

This bettor has won 36 of 36 resolved positions and is up $101,767 lifetime.
They are a serial sports trader across 71 events with a perfect tracked record so far.
Entry at 47¢ on No implies they see Girona failing to win as underpriced.

$2,588 on No | Wallet win rate: 100%

27-0 serial sports sharp

Surfacing because a highly proven sports/cross-market bettor with a 27-0 resolved record and strong profit is buying Girona No at 46¢.

This bettor has won 27 of 27 resolved trades and is up $56.8K lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 44 events with a perfect resolved record so far.
Entry at 46¢ implies they see Girona failing to win as a near-even bet with upside.

$3,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 99%

Profitable sharp buying No

Surfaced because a proven profitable wallet with a 79% resolved win rate is buying No despite only moderate alert severity.

This bettor has won 79% of resolved bets and is up $19.2K lifetime.
They are taking No at 44¢, implying a roughly 2.3x payout if Girona fails to win.
The wallet has been flagged before and is betting against a market that has moved toward Yes this week.

$2,417 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

Top Holders

0xd1c5...cbd0 — Outcome 57453461, $273,479 (100% win rate)
0x3fd9...1ef0 — Outcome 57453461, $194,119 (95% win rate)
0xc3c3...eec8 — Outcome 57453461, $50,000 (99% win rate)
0xa3f8...4682 — Outcome 57453461, $15,401 (87% win rate)
0xdbbb...05a8 — Outcome 57453461, $9,259 (75% win rate)
0xc788...8545 — Outcome 57453461, $5,370 (100% win rate)
0x44c4...09cb — Outcome 57453461, $4,414 (41% win rate)
0x4873...efdc — Outcome 56859711, $3,000
0xf57e...bbd6 — Outcome 57453461, $2,980 (63% win rate)
0x17d6...f1e2 — Outcome 57453461, $2,634 (89% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

Universidad Católica won't win

Covers 1 related market

Will Girona FC win on 2026-05-23?

ResolvedGirona FC vs. Elche CF$352,248 tracked16 signalsSportsGamesSoccerLa Liga

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 23, 2026 If Girona FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.