Will Senegal win on 2026-06-26?

21 smart money signals detected, totaling $484,652.

Categories: Sports, FIFA World Cup, Soccer, Games

Notable Trades

78% winner caught move

Sharp profitable sports bettor bought Senegal at 81¢ before the market rallied to 94¢ amid a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 78% of resolved trades and is up $41k lifetime.
They bought Senegal at 81¢ before the price jumped to 94¢.
Market volume surged 138x versus normal, reinforcing the move.

$2,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 79%

Winning sports bettor momentum

Moderately interesting Senegal Yes buy from an 81% historical winner, supported by a major pre-event volume spike and a sharp move from 81¢ to 94¢.

This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades, though lifetime profit is slightly negative.
They bought Senegal Yes at 81¢ before the market moved to 94¢.
Market volume spiked 138x versus normal, with Senegal odds up 14 points today.

$3,298 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 80%

88% winner backing Yes

Surface: this is a proven high-volume sports bettor with an 88% win rate and $3.3M profit buying Senegal amid a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 88% of resolved trades and is up $3.3M lifetime.
They have traded over 1,000 events with nearly $9.8M in cross-market volume, suggesting a repeatable sports edge.
Market volume spiked 178x before the game, and they bought Yes at 80¢.

$2,641 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 88%

92% serial sports bettor

Sharp serial cross-market sports bettor with a 92% record and positive lifetime P&L is buying Senegal despite a highly liquid market.

This bettor has won 92% of 555 resolved trades and is up about $4.2k lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader, with $54.6k deployed across 25 sports events.
Buying at 80¢ suggests confidence Senegal is still underpriced despite already being the heavy favorite.

$1,860 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 93%

82% win serial trader

High-win-rate serial sports trader bought Senegal No into a major pre-game volume spike, despite negative lifetime P&L reducing confidence.

This bettor wins 82% of resolved bets across 211 markets and regularly trades across related events.
Market activity spiked 781x before the game, suggesting a wave of fresh positioning.
Buying No at 21¢ implies a nearly 5x payout if Senegal fails to win in regulation.

$4,921 on No | Wallet win rate: 72%

New whale repeat bettor

A 16-day-old repeat whale put $379k on Senegal Yes amid a 202x pre-event volume spike, suggesting strong conviction despite limited resolved history.

A 16-day-old wallet bought $379k of Senegal Yes at 79¢ in one burst.
This wallet has triggered 19 large-bet alerts totaling $1.7M, showing repeated high-conviction sizing.
Market activity spiked 202x versus its historical average, with Yes already up 5 points this week.

$379,002 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 93%

Six-wallet No cluster with sharp whale

High-scoring coordinated No buying on a liquid Senegal match market, backed by a 6-wallet cluster, a major pre-event volume spike, and at least one highly profitable sports-style trader.

Six wallets bought $35.6K of No, with two wallets sharing a funder.
One wallet in the cluster wins 88% of resolved bets and is up $3.3M lifetime.
Market volume spiked 202x before the match, while the cluster entered around 21¢.

$35,588 on No

88% win-rate sharp

Surfaced because a highly profitable 88% win-rate bettor with extensive cross-market history bought Senegal Yes at 80¢.

This bettor wins 88% of resolved trades and is up $3.3M lifetime.
They have traded across 1,224 markets with a strong long-term record.
Entry at 80¢ shows confidence despite an already liquid market.

$4,851 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 88%

Sharp serial sports bettor

Sharp sports bettor with a 79% record and strong lifetime profit is buying Senegal Yes despite the market already being liquid and priced at 80%.

This bettor wins 79% of resolved trades and is up $81,220 lifetime.
They have traded across 61 events, suggesting a repeatable sports edge rather than a one-off bet.
Entry at 80¢ means they are backing Senegal even at favorite pricing.

$1,280 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 80%

86% winner backing favorite

Sharp wallet with an 86% resolved win rate and positive lifetime P&L bought $12.7k of Senegal Yes amid a pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved trades and is up $42k lifetime.
They put $12.7k on Senegal at 80¢, adding meaningful conviction despite a liquid market.
Market activity is heating up, with volume running 19x above its historical average.

$12,695 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 88%

Top Holders

0x9ee8...89de — Outcome 12426288, $460,443 (73% win rate)
0x9703...69c2 — Outcome 12426288, $219,687
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 12426288, $151,055
0xad94...85b1 — Outcome 12426288, $70,000 (41% win rate)
0x4f29...7a7e — Outcome 12426288, $60,000 (54% win rate)
0x5fd8...ce32 — Outcome 12426288, $48,000 (94% win rate)
0x1b76...0c37 — Outcome 12426288, $43,000 (88% win rate)
0xf3c7...c83b — Outcome 12426288, $25,826 (87% win rate)
0xec8d...dd71 — Outcome 12426288, $16,350 (73% win rate)
0xec4c...fb48 — Outcome 12426288, $15,057 (100% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 5 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Belgium-Iran avoids a draw

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Will Senegal win on 2026-06-26?

ResolvedSenegal vs. Iraq$484,652 tracked21 signalsSportsFIFA World CupSoccerGames

In the upcoming game, scheduled for June 26, 2026 If Senegal wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Price History — “Yes”