Part of: Ipswich Town FC vs. Liverpool FC

Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-09-04?

8 smart money signals detected, totaling $163,348.

Categories: Premier League, Sports, Games, Soccer, EPL

Notable Trades

Sharp bettor joins 21-wallet No cluster

A proven bettor added to an existing No position alongside 21 linked wallets deploying $275,504, making this a strong coordinated contrarian signal despite the inconsistent displayed odds.

This bettor wins 77% of 259 resolved trades and is up $7,219 lifetime.
Twenty-one wallets, including two linked by funding, bought No for a combined $275,504.
The wallet added to an existing No position at 36¢, signaling increased conviction rather than routine profit-taking.

$1,818 on No | Wallet win rate: 77%

Sharp bettor joins 21-wallet No cluster

A proven 91% win-rate serial trader joined a 21-wallet, linked-funder No position totaling $275,504, making this a strong coordinated signal despite the market now showing No at zero.

Twenty-one wallets, including two linked through a shared funder, bought No for a combined $275,504.
This bettor has won 91% of 435 resolved trades and is up $98,705 lifetime.
The position was entered at 39¢, implying the cluster viewed No as substantially undervalued at the time.

$2,150 on No | Wallet win rate: 91%

21-wallet linked No cluster

A 21-wallet linked cluster is buying No, reinforced by a serial cross-market trader with 1,795 resolved bets and an 87% win rate, despite this individual trade being a position exit.

Twenty-one wallets are betting No with $275,504 in combined volume, and two share a funder.
This trader has an 87% win rate across 1,795 resolved bets and has traded 99 events.
The individual trade appears to close an existing Yes position, so the coordinated No flow is the stronger copy signal.

$1,663 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%

Five-wallet $100K No cluster

Five wallets deployed $100,425 into No amid a 145.7x volume spike, creating a meaningful coordinated bearish signal despite mixed individual track records.

Five wallets bought No for a combined $100,425, including one $76,000 purchase.
The trades arrived during a 145.7x historical volume spike, while No had only 38% implied odds.
Several wallets are adding to existing No positions, signaling increased conviction rather than routine repositioning.

$24,626 on No

Sharp bettor scaling into Liverpool Yes

A proven bettor with an 82% win rate and substantial positive edge is adding $2,000 to an existing Liverpool Yes position at 65%.

This bettor wins 82% of resolved trades (36 of 44) and is up $38,439.
They are adding $2,000 to an existing Yes position, showing increased conviction rather than routine profit-taking.
The wallet has traded across 27 events, providing a broad and repeatable track record.

$2,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 84%

Linked Liverpool Yes buying cluster

A large linked-wallet group and several profitable bettors bought Liverpool Yes around 61-65%, though an even larger opposing No cluster makes the signal mixed and the market is now fully priced.

23 linked wallets committed $119,511 to Yes, with most entries between 61¢ and 65%.
Several participating bettors show strong records, including 93% wins over 237 resolved bets and 83% over 151.
The signal is contested by 21 linked wallets buying No for $275,504, and Yes is now priced at 100%.

$119,511 on Yes

Sharp bettor scaling into Liverpool Yes

A highly profitable sharp bettor with an 86% win rate is adding $6,000 to an existing Liverpool Yes position at 65%.

This bettor wins 86% of 222 resolved trades and is up $288,412 lifetime.
They are adding $6,000 to an existing Yes position, showing increased conviction at 65¢.
The wallet has traded across 224 markets and 122 events, making this a seasoned directional signal rather than a one-off bet.

$6,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 58%

Profitable serial trader adds to No

A serial cross-market trader with a 72% win rate and $477,167 profit is adding $5,580 to an existing No position amid an extreme volume spike.

This bettor has won 72% of 78 resolved trades and is up $477,167 overall.
They added $5,580 to an existing No position, bringing their investment in the outcome to $15,500.
The trade represented 723.6% of recent 24-hour volume, while market activity spiked more than 11,000x its historical average.

$5,580 on No | Wallet win rate: 73%

Top Holders

0x9319...6410 — Outcome 65250270, $200,000 (100% win rate)
0x9ee8...89de — Outcome 65250270, $65,216 (80% win rate)
0x8b32...5950 — Outcome 65250270, $64,932 (45% win rate)
0xd776...ffeb — Outcome 65250270, $50,000 (48% win rate)
0x2c80...08ff — Outcome 65250270, $16,824 (100% win rate)
0xa3c5...6930 — Outcome 65250270, $16,500 (73% win rate)
0x2759...2b38 — Outcome 65250270, $15,639 (65% win rate)
0x7ea5...de7b — Outcome 65250270, $14,895 (62% win rate)
0xe0e6...584b — Outcome 65250270, $11,110 (91% win rate)
0x5c3a...020b — Outcome 65250270, $8,427 (58% win rate)

Related Theses

Ninjas in Pyjamas Sweep LGD Gaming

Covers 5 related markets

Anyone’s Legend sweeps LGD Gaming

Covers 4 related markets

Karmine Corp sweeps GIANTX series

Covers 3 related markets

Invictus Gaming Sweeps LGD Gaming

Covers 4 related markets

Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-09-04?

ResolvedIpswich Town FC vs. Liverpool FC$163,348 tracked8 signalsPremier LeagueSportsGamesSoccerEPL

In the upcoming game, scheduled for September 4, 2026 If Liverpool FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.

Price History — “Yes”

67¢

63¢

58¢

Alert entriesHigh-conviction