This bettor has won 65 of 67 resolved bets and is up $21,777 lifetime. They beat market odds by a wide margin, winning at an average entry near 59%. Buying No at 74¢ fits the market’s momentum, with Yes down 26 points today.

This bettor wins 93% of resolved trades and is up $47,453 lifetime. They have repeated this cross-market style across 40 events with the same 93% hit rate. Entry at 55¢ on No implies they see NEOM SC failing to win as underpriced.

Part of: NEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club

Will NEOM SC win on 2026-05-21?

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $16,093.

Categories: Saudi Professional League, Soccer, Sports, Games

Notable Trades

97% winner buying No

Sharp sports bettor with a 97% resolved win rate and strong positive P&L bought NEOM SC No at 74¢.

This bettor has won 65 of 67 resolved bets and is up $21,777 lifetime.
They beat market odds by a wide margin, winning at an average entry near 59%.
Buying No at 74¢ fits the market’s momentum, with Yes down 26 points today.

$1,109 on No | Wallet win rate: 97%

Elite sports bettor fades favorite

Sharp sports bettor with an 86% win rate and $1.03M lifetime profit bought NEOM SC No shortly before the scheduled match resolution.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved trades and is up $1.03M lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 237 events with $1.85M traded and the same 86% win rate.
Bought No at 55¢ in a liquid market, implying confidence NEOM SC does not win in regulation.

$1,649 on No | Wallet win rate: 54%

93% winner buying No

Sharp serial sports bettor with a 93% resolved win rate and strong lifetime profit is buying NEOM SC not to win.

This bettor wins 93% of resolved trades and is up $47,453 lifetime.
They have repeated this cross-market style across 40 events with the same 93% hit rate.
Entry at 55¢ on No implies they see NEOM SC failing to win as underpriced.

$2,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%

Sharp cluster nailed No

Five highly profitable wallets with 86–100% historical win rates bought No before it moved to 100%, showing strong coordinated sharp flow, though the trade is now likely no longer copyable at a good price.

Five proven bettors all bought No, including wallets with 86–100% historical win rates.
The group put $11.3K behind the same side as No moved from the low-50¢ range to 100¢.
One wallet in the cluster is up over $1.0M lifetime, making this a strong wallet-follow signal.

$11,335 on No

Top Holders

0xe85d...ad4b — Outcome 97306084, $4,219 (86% win rate)
0x7ea5...de7b — Outcome 97306084, $3,197 (61% win rate)
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 10925980, $1,529
0x5213...6a35 — Outcome 97306084, $851 (74% win rate)
0xeaac...d71d — Outcome 97306084, $745 (82% win rate)
0x5cb4...4576 — Outcome 97306084, $525
0xcf00...353f — Outcome 97306084, $287
0xdc4f...9804 — Outcome 97306084, $270
0x7d7f...86d2 — Outcome 97306084, $269
0x32de...6253 — Outcome 97306084, $163

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Czechia won't beat Korea

Covers 3 related markets

Canada-Bosnia match canceled

Covers 3 related markets

Vissel Kobe will not win

Covers 1 related market

O'Higgins won't win match

Covers 1 related market

Machida Zelvia will not win

Covers 1 related market

Will NEOM SC win on 2026-05-21?

ResolvedNEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club$16,093 tracked4 signalsSaudi Professional LeagueSoccerSportsGames

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 21, 2026 If NEOM SC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.