Part of: LoL: RED Canids vs paiN Gaming (BO3) - CBLOL Regular Season

LoL: RED Canids vs paiN Gaming - Game 1 Winner

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $36,359.

Categories: Esports, league of legends, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Sharp cluster buys underdog

Three wallets piled into paiN Gaming at 22-27¢ during a 30x volume spike, including one bettor with a 71% win rate and nearly $1.0M in profits, making this coordinated underdog buy worth surfacing.

Three wallets bought paiN Gaming together for $11.3k during a 30x burst in market activity.
One of the wallets wins 71% of 737 resolved bets and is up about $985k lifetime.
They entered around 22-27¢, a cheap underdog price that implies they see paiN Gaming as materially undervalued.

$11,348 on paiN Gaming

Profitable contrarian esports bet

A profitable high-volume bettor put over $7.3k behind paiN Gaming into a sharp pre-match volume spike, moving against a heavily favored side at 23-27¢.

This bettor has over 1,100 resolved trades and is up $52k lifetime.
They effectively put $7.4k on paiN Gaming at 23-27¢, including selling RED at 76¢ to add to the same view.
The bet was larger than the market's prior daily volume and landed during a 2310x pre-match volume spike.

$7,369 on paiN Gaming | Wallet win rate: 53%

Profitable sharp buys underdog

A high-volume surge hit this esports market and a nearly $1M profitable bettor used it to buy the underdog at 22¢, making this a worthwhile sharp-positioning alert despite the modest composite score.

This bettor has won 71% of 737 resolved trades and is up about $985k lifetime
They bought paiN Gaming at 22¢, a cheap underdog entry that could return more than 4x if it hits
Market activity suddenly exploded with a 2310x volume spike, suggesting fresh conviction ahead of the match

$2,161 on paiN Gaming | Wallet win rate: 74%

4-wallet sports pile-in

Four active wallets piled $15.5k into RED Canids within minutes during a huge pre-match volume spike, a coordinated move worth watching despite only modest individual win rates.

Four wallets bought RED Canids at the same time for $15.5k total, a strong one-sided signal.
The market saw a 2310x volume spike and RED Canids had already moved up 43 points over the week.
These wallets are active and profitable overall, with $24k to $60k lifetime profit each across hundreds of resolved bets.

$15,482 on RED Canids

Top Holders

0xef26...05ba — Outcome 75247403, $13,593 (74% win rate)
0xdaef...54e9 — Outcome 75247403, $3,927 (64% win rate)
0x5511...5734 — Outcome 75247403, $3,000 (72% win rate)
0x04bd...39a0 — Outcome 75247403, $2,010 (61% win rate)
0x0231...f72b — Outcome 75247403, $1,067
0x0698...b91d — Outcome 75247403, $590 (81% win rate)
0x200e...e21d — Outcome 75247403, $558
0x048f...9992 — Outcome 75247403, $540
0xd4aa...d40c — Outcome 75247403, $481
0xffd8...7514 — Outcome 75247403, $305 (64% win rate)

Related Theses

MOUZ defeats G2 in BO3

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Covers 1 related market

LoL: RED Canids vs paiN Gaming - Game 1 Winner

ResolvedLoL: RED Canids vs paiN Gaming (BO3) - CBLOL Regular Season$36,359 tracked4 signalsEsportsleague of legendsGamesSports

This market refers to the LoL match between RED Canids and paiN Gaming in the CBLOL Regular Season, initially scheduled for April 6 at 3:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "RED Canids" if RED Canids win Game 1 against paiN Gaming. This market will resolve to "paiN Gaming" if paiN Gaming win Game 1 against RED Canids. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.