Part of: Pisa SC vs. US Lecce

Will US Lecce win on 2026-05-01?

14 smart money signals detected, totaling $370,572.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, sea

Notable Trades

$2M winner leading Yes cluster

Four wallets bought $34.3k of Lecce Yes amid a 42x volume spike, led by a profitable $2.0M cross-market trader.

A bettor up $2.0M lifetime led the move, buying about $19k of Yes at 40¢.
Four wallets all bought the same side, totaling $34.3k on Lecce to win.
Market volume is running 42x above normal and Yes is up 8 points this week.

$34,300 on Yes

90% winner buying underdog

A profitable sports bettor with a 90% resolved-bet win rate is taking a fresh $1.8k position at 40¢ despite the market being highly liquid.

This bettor wins 90% of resolved bets and is up $21.7k lifetime.
Their past wins came at much tougher average prices, beating implied odds by 27 points.
Entry at 40¢ implies a 2.5x payout if this wins.

$1,800 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 92%

91% winner buying Yes

A highly profitable 91% win-rate wallet with extensive cross-market history bought Lecce Yes at 40¢, making this a strong sharp-bettor copy-trade signal despite modest size.

This bettor wins 91% of resolved trades and is up $384K lifetime.
They have traded across 25 events with the same 91% hit rate, suggesting a repeatable sports edge.
Entry at 40¢ implies a 2.5x payout if Lecce wins.

$1,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 91%

85% winner buying Yes

Sharp sports bettor with an 85% resolved win rate and strong profit is buying Lecce Yes at 40¢.

This bettor wins 85% of resolved trades and is up $41,080 lifetime.
They have bet across 32 sports events with the same 85% hit rate.
Entry at 40¢ implies they see Lecce as underpriced versus the current market.

$2,675 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 78%

Profitable new whale backing No

A repeat new-wallet whale with large prior flagged volume and strong early P&L bought $17.3k of No in a liquid Lecce market amid a pregame volume spike.

This new wallet has already made 61 large flagged bets totaling about $429k.
The wallet shows roughly $221k in profit on $645k invested, though its resolved track record is still very small.
It bought $17.3k of No at 60¢ as pregame volume jumped 12.6x above normal.

$17,329 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New whale hammering NO

A 24-day-old repeat whale is adding a $22.6k NO position after $417k in prior flagged bets and early profits, though the track record is still short.

This 24-day-old wallet has already put $417k into flagged large bets and is up $221k so far.
They built a $22.6k NO position across 9 buys at 60¢.
Entry at 60¢ suggests they see Lecce failing to win as underpriced despite a liquid market.

$22,628 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New profitable whale buying NO

A new high-volume wallet with large early profits is putting $22k on No, though the signal is mainly conviction rather than a proven long-term track record.

This 24-day-old wallet has already deployed $645k and is up about $221k.
The bettor put $22k on No at 60¢ across seven trades, showing concentrated conviction.
The market is very liquid, so this looks more like a deliberate position than a thin-market price push.

$22,120 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New profitable whale buying NO

A 24-day-old wallet with repeated large-bet flags and $221k profit is putting $10.5k on No, though the market is liquid and the track record is still small.

This new wallet has already been flagged 50 times for large bets, totaling about $401k.
The bettor is up $221k so far despite only 2 resolved markets, suggesting early positive results but a short track record.
They bought $10.5k of No at 60¢, backing Lecce not to win in a liquid soccer market.

$10,520 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New profitable whale buying No

A 24-day-old repeat whale with large prior flagged activity and strong early P&L bought $23k of No on a liquid soccer market.

This new wallet has already put $398k into flagged bets and is up about $221k so far.
They bought $23k of No at 60¢ across three trades, showing a concentrated view against Lecce winning.
The market is highly liquid, so this is less about thin-market noise and more about a sizable directional sports bet.

$23,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New profitable whale buying NO

A 24-day-old repeat whale with $393k in flagged activity and reported +$221k P&L bought $18k of No on a liquid soccer market.

This 24-day-old wallet has already made many large bets, with $393k flagged across 48 alerts.
The wallet is reported up $221k on $645k invested, though it only has 2 resolved bets so far.
It bought $18k of No at 60¢, adding a clear position against a Lecce win.

$18,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

Top Holders

0xbee5...a636 — Outcome 48803811, $453,448 (80% win rate)
0x3f3a...e8fd — Outcome 48803811, $51,206 (88% win rate)
0xee0d...57ab — Outcome 48803811, $16,558 (100% win rate)
0xfe78...0319 — Outcome 48803811, $3,556 (73% win rate)
0x4188...b517 — Outcome 48803811, $3,500
0x9495...9a27 — Outcome 48803811, $2,303 (64% win rate)
0xc463...9a2f — Outcome 48803811, $2,067 (54% win rate)
0x9d94...017d — Outcome 48803811, $1,707
0x6945...873d — Outcome 48803811, $1,017 (100% win rate)
0x124b...bd60 — Outcome 48803811, $860

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

Will US Lecce win on 2026-05-01?

ResolvedPisa SC vs. US Lecce$370,572 tracked14 signalsSportsGamesSoccersea

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 1, 2026 If US Lecce wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.