This bettor wins 92% of resolved trades and is up $29.7K lifetime. They bought Yakult Brothers at 29¢, implying a contrarian view against the current 26¢ market price. Their past wins came around 53¢ average odds, so the track record is not just from betting heavy favorites.

Part of: Dota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Vici Gaming (BO3) - The International China Closed Qualifier Playoffs

Dota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Vici Gaming - Game 2 Winner

3 smart money signals detected, totaling $4,474.

Categories: Esports, Dota 2, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

94% win-rate esports sharp

Elite proven Dota/esports bettor with a 94% win rate and $655k profit bought Vici Gaming, backed by serial cross-market success and linked-wallet context.

This bettor wins 94% of resolved trades and is up $655k lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 231 events with a 94% hit rate.
The $2.3k buy backs Vici at 74¢ after Yakult Brothers fell sharply in price.

$2,300 on Vici Gaming | Wallet win rate: 94%

92% win-rate sharp

Sharp esports bettor with a 92% resolved win rate and strong profit bought Yakult Brothers despite the market moving against them since entry.

This bettor wins 92% of resolved trades and is up $29.7K lifetime.
They bought Yakult Brothers at 29¢, implying a contrarian view against the current 26¢ market price.
Their past wins came around 53¢ average odds, so the track record is not just from betting heavy favorites.

$1,160 on Yakult Brothers | Wallet win rate: 92%

Fresh wallet up $4.8K

A 2-day-old wallet with an 88% resolved record and +$4.8K early profit is making a fresh Vici Gaming bet in a relatively small esports market.

This new bettor has won 7 of 8 resolved trades and is already up $4.8K.
They bought Vici Gaming at 66¢ in a market with only $16K total volume, making the bet meaningful for the book.
Entry at 66¢ implies they see Vici as a strong favorite despite the market now sitting around 63¢.

$1,014 on Vici Gaming | Wallet win rate: 88%

Top Holders

0xe16d...5e30 — Outcome 21329457, $18,266 (97% win rate)
0xf3ce...a57a — Outcome 21329457, $4,353 (94% win rate)
0x05a7...42e6 — Outcome 21329457, $3,917 (96% win rate)
0x3a86...cc01 — Outcome 21329457, $2,083 (57% win rate)
0xb635...bef0 — Outcome 21329457, $2,000 (53% win rate)
0x6e44...21bc — Outcome 21329457, $1,945 (76% win rate)
0xedf3...9567 — Outcome 21329457, $1,765 (88% win rate)
0x775d...6beb — Outcome 21329457, $1,471 (64% win rate)
0xfe3f...0fcf — Outcome 21329457, $1,252 (57% win rate)
0x65c4...3c1a — Outcome 21329457, $1,050 (56% win rate)

Related Theses

PARIVISION sweeps Xtreme Gaming

Covers 3 related markets

NaVi sweeps, Tundra hedge

Covers 3 related markets

PARIVISION wins in five

Covers 5 related markets

Yandex wins, LGD takes Game 3

Covers 3 related markets

Team Spirit beats Tundra

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Dota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Vici Gaming - Game 2 Winner

ResolvedDota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Vici Gaming (BO3) - The International China Closed Qualifier Playoffs$4,474 tracked3 signalsEsportsDota 2GamesSports

This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket semifinal 2 match between Yakult Brothers and Vici Gaming in the The International China Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 16 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Yakult Brothers" if Yakult Brothers win Game 2 against Vici Gaming. This market will resolve to "Vici Gaming" if Vici Gaming win Game 2 against Yakult Brothers. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 2 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 2. If Game 2 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.