Part of: Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

8 smart money signals detected, totaling $29,462.

Categories: Esports, counter strike 2, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Profitable serial bettor

Profitable serial cross-market bettor with a 61% resolved win rate and $338k lifetime profit bought nearly $5k of Sharks, helping drive a fast price move.

  • This bettor has won 61% of 348 resolved trades and is up $338k lifetime.
  • They are a heavy serial trader across 142 events, with $843k flagged in cross-market activity.
  • Their $4.9k Sharks buy helped push the price up 14.5 points in about 4 minutes.

$4,914 on Sharks | Wallet win rate: 61%

88% winner-led Sharks cluster

Strong Sharks buy cluster led by proven profitable bettors, including an 88% winner, alongside a 24-point price move and pre-event volume spike.

  • A bettor who wins 88% of resolved trades is buying Sharks and is up $40K lifetime.
  • Three wallets bought the same side for $7.9K, helping push Sharks from 39¢ to about 62¢.
  • Volume is 14x above normal before the match, suggesting strong pre-event conviction.

$7,863 on Sharks

Profitable serial esports bettor

Serial cross-market esports bettor with a solid profitable record bought Sharks despite the market later moving sharply against the position.

  • This bettor has won 64% of 36 resolved trades and is up $46K lifetime.
  • They are a serial cross-market trader across 42 events with $179K in tracked volume.
  • The Sharks entry was at 53¢, while the market has since fallen to 32¢, creating a much cheaper follow-on price than the bettor paid.

$1,854 on Sharks | Wallet win rate: 65%

82% esports sharp on underdog

Sharp esports bettor with an 82% resolved win rate and strong lifetime profit bought Sharks despite the market pricing them as the underdog.

  • This bettor wins 82% of resolved trades and is up $91K lifetime.
  • They are a serial cross-market trader across 60 events with the same 82% hit rate.
  • They bought Sharks at 45¢, implying they see value above the current 40% market price.

$3,576 on Sharks | Wallet win rate: 83%

New wallet backing favorite

A 1.5-day-old wallet with an early profitable track record placed a $5.1k Alliance bet during a sharp pre-event volume spike.

  • A brand-new wallet put $5.1k on Alliance at 57¢, and the price has already moved to 60¢.
  • The wallet is only 1.5 days old but is already up $1.5k on its first resolved bet.
  • Market volume spiked 64x before the match, suggesting fresh money is piling into this side.

$5,130 on Alliance | Wallet win rate: 100%

Profitable serial trader

Low signal score, but the wallet has a large profitable history and is a serial cross-market trader backing Sharks at 47¢.

  • This bettor is up $187,718 across 2,779 resolved markets.
  • They have traded 133 events and $425,138 in cross-market positions.
  • Entry at 47¢ backs Sharks as a near-even underdog.

$1,125 on Sharks | Wallet win rate: 58%

Profitable serial trader

A highly profitable serial cross-market bettor with $870k lifetime profit is taking a fresh $3k position on Alliance at 54¢.

  • This bettor is up about $870k across 135 resolved bets, with $3.2M deployed.
  • They have traded 206 events and 234 markets, suggesting a repeatable cross-market betting process.
  • Entry at 54¢ means they are backing Alliance as a slight favorite, not chasing a long-shot.

$3,000 on Alliance | Wallet win rate: 58%

92% winner backs Alliance

Sharp esports bettor with a 92% win rate and nearly $200k lifetime profit bought Alliance at 54%, making this worth surfacing despite the low composite score.

  • This bettor wins 92% of resolved trades and is up about $200k lifetime.
  • They put $2,000 on Alliance at 54¢, a meaningful bet relative to recent activity.
  • Entry at 54¢ implies they see Alliance as underpriced in this BO3 match.

$2,000 on Alliance | Wallet win rate: 92%

Top Holders

  1. 0xf4ec...c574 Outcome 27967131, $20,945 (53% win rate)
  2. 0x86e9...4cdf Outcome 27967131, $13,000 (99% win rate)
  3. 0xe40e...9770 Outcome 27967131, $12,070 (100% win rate)
  4. 0x2266...138a Outcome 27967131, $9,441 (47% win rate)
  5. 0x629d...756c Outcome 27967131, $8,868
  6. 0xdb85...152f Outcome 27967131, $5,556 (58% win rate)
  7. 0x8056...b64d Outcome 27967131, $4,807 (49% win rate)
  8. 0x3da8...80c3 Outcome 27967131, $3,704 (92% win rate)
  9. 0x1d5c...4f26 Outcome 27967131, $2,993 (69% win rate)
  10. 0xe504...600e Outcome 27967131, $2,103 (59% win rate)

Related Theses

BNK FEARX beats Nongshim

Covers 1 related market

Covers 3 related markets

MOUZ sweeps MIBR

Covers 2 related markets

KT Rolster sweeps DN SOOPers

Covers 3 related markets

T1 sweeps BNK FEARX

Covers 3 related markets

Sparks beat Mystics

Covers 1 related market

Knicks cover the spread

Covers 1 related market

Guardians beat the Tigers

Covers 1 related market

100 Thieves beat Nuclear TigeRES

Covers 2 related markets

Stewart beats Ivashka

Covers 1 related market

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

ResolvedCounter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs$29,462 tracked8 signalsEsportscounter strike 2GamesSports

This market refers to the Counter-Strike Lower bracket quarterfinal 1 match between Alliance and Sharks in the Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs, initially scheduled for May 29 at 8:30AM ET. This market will resolve to "Alliance" if Alliance win the match against Sharks. This market will resolve to "Sharks" if Sharks win the match against Alliance. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.

Price History — “Sharks
102¢
73¢
44¢
Alert entriesHigh-conviction

Notable Trades

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$4,914 on Sharks at 63¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$7,863 on Sharks at 63¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$1,854 on Sharks at 53¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$3,576 on Sharks at 45¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$5,130 on Alliance at 57¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$1,125 on Sharks at 47¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$3,000 on Alliance at 54¢

Counter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs

1d ago

$2,000 on Alliance at 54¢

Related Theses