Part of: LoL: Invictus Gaming vs Team WE (BO5) - LPL Playoffs

LoL: Invictus Gaming vs Team WE - Game 4 Winner

7 smart money signals detected, totaling $243,080.

Categories: Esports, league of legends, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

21-wallet Team WE cluster

A 21-wallet one-sided Team WE cluster and 27.8x volume spike made this a notable coordinated esports position, although the wallet was adding to an existing position and Team WE is now priced at 0%.

Twenty-one wallets bought Team WE in the same direction, totaling $70,246.
The market saw a 27.8x surge versus its historical trading activity.
This bettor has 355 resolved trades, a 65% win rate, and $206,619 in lifetime profit, but was adding to an existing Team WE position.

$3,354 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 65%

Profitable cross-market esports bettor

A highly experienced bettor with 2,035 resolved trades and $4.07M profit made a concentrated Team WE position amid a major event-wide volume spike.

This bettor is up $4.07M across 2,035 resolved trades with a 70% win rate.
They placed an $8,004 Team WE bet at 43¢ while committing $98,083 across five markets in the same event.
The trade followed a reported 782x volume spike, adding strong event-specific conviction to the bettor’s track record.

$2,960 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 70%

Sharp bettors coordinate on Team WE

A large coordinated Team WE position includes several highly profitable, proven bettors buying around 36-43% as the market moved to 42%.

14 wallets committed $44,508 to Team WE, including bettors with 82%, 83%, and 88% win rates.
The strongest traders have substantial proven profits, including one up $2.66 million across 422 resolved positions.
Most entries were between 36¢ and 43¢, with the market now at 42¢ after a sharp volume spike.

$25,139 on Team WE

90% winner backs Invictus Gaming

A highly profitable serial trader with a 90% win rate bought Invictus Gaming amid a major one-sided flow and pre-event volume surge.

This bettor has won 90% of 808 resolved trades and earned nearly $1.0M in profit.
Sixteen wallets bought Invictus Gaming in the same window, totaling $117,626.
The market saw a 2,188x volume spike, reinforcing the coordinated bullish positioning despite the price falling to 58%.

$3,098 on Invictus Gaming | Wallet win rate: 89%

Sharp wallets buying Invictus Gaming

A large, concentrated Invictus Gaming position was built around 60–68¢, supported by several highly profitable bettors and a major volume spike.

Nineteen wallets committed about $144,000 to Invictus Gaming, with several entries between 60¢ and 68¢ before the market moved to 90¢.
The group includes bettors with exceptional records, including 95% across 22 positions, 90% across 809, and 82% across 1,113.
Trading surged to 36.7 times the recent average, while some participants added to substantial existing Invictus Gaming positions.

$197,105 on Invictus Gaming

Profitable cross-market esports bettor

A highly experienced bettor with 2,035 resolved trades and $4.07M profit made a concentrated Team WE position amid a major event-wide volume spike.

This bettor is up $4.07M across 2,035 resolved trades with a 70% win rate.
They placed an $8,004 Team WE bet at 43¢ while committing $98,083 across five markets in the same event.
The trade followed a reported 782x volume spike, adding strong event-specific conviction to the bettor’s track record.

$8,004 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 70%

Profitable bettor scaling into Invictus

A profitable esports bettor with a 69% win rate is adding to an existing Invictus Gaming position while expressing a view across three related markets.

This bettor wins 69% of resolved trades across 35 bets and is up $35,733 lifetime.
They are adding $3,420 to an existing Invictus Gaming position at 57¢, despite the market’s low recent volume.
The wallet has traded three markets from the same event, suggesting a broader informed match thesis.

$3,420 on Invictus Gaming | Wallet win rate: 82%

Top Holders

0x52ec...a6f3 — Outcome 30323423, $74,782 (70% win rate)
0x17f1...af18 — Outcome 30323423, $33,333 (56% win rate)
0xf485...03ae — Outcome 30323423, $30,000 (98% win rate)
0xce7d...898e — Outcome 30323423, $21,970 (65% win rate)
0xa4fd...748b — Outcome 30323423, $16,821 (88% win rate)
0x84fb...675e — Outcome 30323423, $11,369 (57% win rate)
0x66b1...6b9d — Outcome 30323423, $10,001 (58% win rate)
0x5784...2371 — Outcome 30323423, $9,179 (84% win rate)
0x4d8b...ce22 — Outcome 30323423, $8,539 (62% win rate)
0xe2d0...7bbf — Outcome 30323423, $8,147 (63% win rate)

Related Theses

LYON reverse sweeps Team Liquid

Covers 5 related markets

LoL: Invictus Gaming vs Team WE - Game 4 Winner

ResolvedLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Team WE (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$243,080 tracked7 signalsEsportsleague of legendsGamesSports

This market refers to the LoL Lower bracket quarterfinal 1 match between Invictus Gaming and Team WE in the LPL Playoffs, initially scheduled for September 6, 2026 at 2:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "Invictus Gaming" if Invictus Gaming win Game 4 against Team WE. This market will resolve to "Team WE" if Team WE win Game 4 against Invictus Gaming. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 4 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 4. If Game 4 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all), this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 20, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of September 6, 2026 at 2:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.