Part of: LoL: Team WE vs LNG Esports (BO5) - LPL Play-In

LoL: Team WE vs LNG Esports - Game 1 Winner

9 smart money signals detected, totaling $72,397.

Categories: Esports, league of legends, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Profitable serial esports trader

Profitable serial cross-market trader effectively backed Team WE at 20¢ before the market moved sharply toward that side.

This bettor has won 71% of 836 resolved trades and is up about $540k lifetime.
They effectively bought Team WE at 20¢ by selling LNG at 80¢, while Team WE is now around 52¢.
This wallet is a serial cross-market trader with over $1.1M deployed across 216 markets.

$1,291 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 71%

Profitable contrarians on underdog

High-scoring Team WE contrarian cluster led by profitable serial cross-market bettors, though the broader market has recently moved toward LNG.

Two prolific bettors with 71% win records and over $1.7M combined profit are leaning Team WE.
Three wallets put $16K on the underdog side, nearly matching the market’s listed liquidity.
This is a contrarian entry: Team WE has dropped from about 40¢ to 32¢ while the sharp cluster is positioned the other way.

$16,007 on Team WE

Sharp esports bettor joins LNG rush

Sharp esports bettor with an 86% record bought LNG alongside broad one-sided flow, volume spike, and a 21-point price move.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved bets and is up $90K lifetime.
Nine wallets bought the same LNG side for $32.6K total.
LNG moved from 57¢ to 68¢ after the trade, backed by a 36x volume spike.

$4,902 on LNG Esports | Wallet win rate: 81%

Profitable serial bettor joins LNG cluster

Profitable high-volume cross-market bettor bought LNG alongside 9-wallet one-sided flow, a 36x volume spike, and a sharp price move from 57¢ to 68¢.

This bettor has a long record across esports-style markets: 2,079 resolved bets and $655K lifetime profit.
Nine wallets bought LNG the same way, totaling $32.6K in one-sided flow.
LNG moved from this entry at 57¢ to 68¢ as volume spiked 36x before the match.

$2,138 on LNG Esports | Wallet win rate: 61%

Sharp bettor plus 9-wallet LNG flow

Sharp profitable wallet joined a 9-wallet one-sided LNG wave with volume spike and price impact, despite the market now trading below their 83¢ entry.

This bettor wins 85% of resolved trades and is up $7.6K on $24.1K invested.
Nine wallets bought LNG the same way, totaling $32.6K in coordinated one-sided flow.
LNG is now around 68¢ after this bettor entered at 83¢, offering a cheaper price than the sharp entry.

$1,109 on LNG Esports | Wallet win rate: 89%

Million-dollar serial trader

Highly profitable serial cross-market trader with a $1.24M lifetime P&L is buying Team WE into a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 71% of resolved bets and is up $1.24M lifetime.
They have traded across 316 events with nearly $2.3M in cross-market volume.
Team WE was bought at 42¢ during an 801x pre-event volume spike.

$2,100 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 78%

Profitable whale on Team WE

Profitable high-volume wallet bought $12.6k of Team WE into a quiet esports market amid an 801x pre-event volume spike and rapid price movement.

This wallet is up about $692k lifetime across 1,692 resolved bets.
They put $12.6k on Team WE, more than the market’s entire reported 24h volume.
The market saw an 801x pre-event volume spike, suggesting unusual positioning before Game 1.

$12,616 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 45%

Sharp 7-wallet LNG surge

Strong one-sided LNG Esports cluster with multiple profitable sharp wallets, a major pre-event volume spike, and immediate price movement from the high-50s to 68%.

Seven wallets bought $29.5K of LNG Esports in a tight burst, moving the price from 57–59¢ to 68¢.
Two bettors in the cluster have strong records: one wins 86% and is up $90K, another wins 81% and is up $39K.
Volume spiked over 4,600x normal activity before the match, suggesting coordinated conviction on LNG.

$29,534 on LNG Esports

Profitable bettor buying underdog

Profitable high-volume wallet bought $2.7k of Team WE in a quiet esports market during a sharp pre-event volume spike.

This wallet is up about $692k across 1,692 resolved markets.
They bought $2.7k of Team WE at 41¢ in a market with only about $8k of daily volume.
Market activity spiked 231x before the match, and the price has already moved to 43¢.

$2,701 on Team WE | Wallet win rate: 45%

Top Holders

0x8c0b...7aa5 — Outcome 47899218, $28,655 (58% win rate)
0xf201...527e — Outcome 47899218, $14,471 (71% win rate)
0x8fd1...bfe8 — Outcome 47899218, $10,100 (65% win rate)
0x6b97...8d30 — Outcome 47899218, $8,600 (81% win rate)
0xbca8...cf14 — Outcome 47899218, $7,698 (73% win rate)
0xe52c...01f4 — Outcome 47899218, $5,250 (66% win rate)
0xce08...510b — Outcome 47899218, $4,441 (65% win rate)
0x6842...20d0 — Outcome 47899218, $3,300 (61% win rate)
0x5b10...9659 — Outcome 47899218, $3,000 (71% win rate)
0xa14c...23a1 — Outcome 47899218, $2,377 (91% win rate)

Related Theses

LYON reverse sweeps Team Liquid

Covers 5 related markets

LoL: Team WE vs LNG Esports - Game 1 Winner

ResolvedLoL: Team WE vs LNG Esports (BO5) - LPL Play-In$72,397 tracked9 signalsEsportsleague of legendsGamesSports

This market refers to the LoL match between Team WE and LNG Esports in the LPL Play-In, initially scheduled for May 23 at 2:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Team WE" if Team WE win Game 1 against LNG Esports. This market will resolve to "LNG Esports" if LNG Esports win Game 1 against Team WE. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.