Part of: Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $20,876.

Notable Trades

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

A high-volume serial sports trader with a large realized track record sold Mary Stoiana at 14¢, which converts to a buy on Alycia Parks at 86¢ after a sharp reversal in this match market.

This bettor has traded 260 events and is up $125k, showing a real track record at scale
They sold Mary Stoiana at 14¢, which is equivalent to buying Alycia Parks at 86¢
The market snapped hard in minutes, with Mary Stoiana moving 12.5 points fast after a bigger 29-point swing

$5,874 on Alycia Parks | Wallet win rate: 61%

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

A high-volume cross-market bettor with a solid 62% win rate and $125k profit bought nearly $5k of Mary Stoiana as the market was moving up, making this a reasonable follow signal despite the modest composite score.

This bettor has won 180 of 291 resolved trades and is up $125k overall.
They have traded 260 events for $3.25M total, so this is a seasoned repeat bettor rather than a random whale.
Bought nearly $5k at 69¢ while Mary Stoiana was moving up fast, showing conviction behind the price move.

$4,968 on Mary Stoiana | Wallet win rate: 61%

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

A high-volume cross-market trader with over $125k profit sold the underdog before a fast price drop, creating a clear copy signal into Mary Stoiana.

This bettor has placed over $4.3M across 291 resolved markets and is up $125k overall.
They sold Alycia Parks at 19¢, and the price quickly fell to 12¢, showing strong timing on this match.
The move came during a 31.9x volume spike, suggesting broader sharp money was also active.

$7,010 on Mary Stoiana | Wallet win rate: 61%

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

Surface this because a proven high-volume sports bettor with a 69% win rate and $169k profit is taking Mary Stoiana at 43¢, a clear underdog entry in a reasonably liquid match market.

This bettor has won 69% of 316 resolved trades and is up $169.8k lifetime
They've traded 240 markets across 225 events, showing a broad repeatable process rather than a one-off bet
Bought Mary Stoiana at 43¢ while the market is now 44¢, a cheap underdog entry with room up to 47¢

$3,025 on Mary Stoiana | Wallet win rate: 64%

Top Holders

0xcb84...08a9 — Outcome 54514101, $25,340 (66% win rate)
0xd6a3...9489 — Outcome 54514101, $9,136 (76% win rate)
0x09f1...240f — Outcome 54514101, $5,000
0x21f3...35e3 — Outcome 54514101, $2,616 (74% win rate)
0x4b49...0397 — Outcome 54514101, $2,000 (77% win rate)
0x9c76...c926 — Outcome 54514101, $2,000 (89% win rate)
0x01c7...e995 — Outcome 54514101, $1,484 (64% win rate)
0x6a32...0086 — Outcome 54514101, $1,158 (78% win rate)
0xd1ed...d7cb — Outcome 54514101, $469 (42% win rate)
0x5e30...acbf — Outcome 54514101, $417 (73% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

Credit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana

ResolvedCredit One Charleston Open: Alycia Parks vs Mary Stoiana$20,876 tracked4 signalsTennisSportsGames

This market refers on the tennis match between Alycia Parks and Mary Stoiana in the Credit One Charleston Open, scheduled for March 30 at 7:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Alycia Parks' if Alycia Parks advances against Mary Stoiana. This market will resolve to 'Mary Stoiana' if Mary Stoiana advances against Alycia Parks. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.