This bettor wins 98% of resolved trades and is up $6.9M lifetime. The $10k Rune Eaters buy is nearly 7x this market’s 24h volume, showing strong conviction in a quiet book. This wallet is a serial cross-market trader across 297 events with a 98% hit rate.

Part of: Dota 2: Poor Rangers vs Rune Eaters - More Markets

Dota 2: Poor Rangers vs Rune Eaters - Game 2 Winner

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $27,237.

Categories: Esports, Dota 2, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

98% winner leads esports cluster

High-confidence Rune Eaters flow led by a bettor with a 98% resolved win rate, plus one-sided cluster buying and a sharp pre-event volume spike.

A bettor who wins 98% of resolved trades and is up $889K bought Rune Eaters at 51–54¢.
Three wallets pushed $13.3K the same way, with Rune Eaters moving up 11.5 percentage points in about 4 minutes.
Market volume is running 21x above normal, suggesting this is more than routine pre-match betting.

$12,841 on Rune Eaters

90% win-rate serial sharp

Surface: a highly profitable 90% win-rate wallet with extensive cross-market history bought Poor Rangers despite the market moving down afterward.

This bettor wins 90% of resolved trades and is up $501k lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader with $1.07M deployed across 182 events.
They bought at 45¢, while the market is now 40¢, offering a cheaper entry than the sharp’s price.

$1,950 on Poor Rangers | Wallet win rate: 91%

9-wallet funded cluster

A funded 9-wallet cluster is adding size on Rune Eaters in a very low-volume esports market, making the flow notable despite the wallet's ordinary standalone track record.

This bettor is part of a 9-wallet group funded by the same address, a strong sign of coordinated conviction.
The $2.4K buy is larger than the market’s entire 24h volume, pushing into a quiet Dota market.
They are adding to an existing Rune Eaters position at 62¢, now backing the favorite with meaningful size.

$2,446 on Rune Eaters | Wallet win rate: 52%

98% win-rate whale

Elite 98% win-rate wallet with $6.9M profit placed a $10k Rune Eaters bet worth nearly 7x the market's 24h volume.

This bettor wins 98% of resolved trades and is up $6.9M lifetime.
The $10k Rune Eaters buy is nearly 7x this market’s 24h volume, showing strong conviction in a quiet book.
This wallet is a serial cross-market trader across 297 events with a 98% hit rate.

$10,000 on Rune Eaters | Wallet win rate: 98%

Top Holders

0x2146...d41b — Outcome 73893970, $34,425 (62% win rate)
0xfe78...0319 — Outcome 73893970, $11,975 (63% win rate)
0xd06c...cdaf — Outcome 73893970, $10,921 (91% win rate)
0x5038...6236 — Outcome 73893970, $4,950 (45% win rate)
0x1c8f...4d12 — Outcome 73893970, $4,782 (91% win rate)
0xa97f...a818 — Outcome 73893970, $1,619 (57% win rate)
0x08b8...e7da — Outcome 73893970, $1,519
0x6eac...ed37 — Outcome 73893970, $1,500
0xc0f1...8680 — Outcome 73893970, $1,200 (74% win rate)
0xd7d3...698b — Outcome 73893970, $1,188 (72% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Dota 2: Poor Rangers vs Rune Eaters - Game 2 Winner

ResolvedDota 2: Poor Rangers vs Rune Eaters - More Markets$27,237 tracked4 signalsEsportsDota 2GamesSports

This market refers to the Dota 2 match between Poor Rangers and Rune Eaters in the Esports World Cup Group A, initially scheduled for July 11 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Poor Rangers" if Poor Rangers win Game 2 against Rune Eaters. This market will resolve to "Rune Eaters" if Rune Eaters win Game 2 against Poor Rangers. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 2 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 2. If Game 2 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.