Part of: FC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo - More Markets

FC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 2.5

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $18,397.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, La Liga

Notable Trades

96% winner leads Over cluster

Three wallets piled into Over with $7.6k, led by one exceptionally strong bettor with a 96% win rate and six-figure profits, making this coordinated sports bet worth watching despite mixed quality in the rest of the cluster.

One wallet in this cluster wins 96% of its bets and is up $107k across 1,874 resolved positions.
Three wallets bought Over for $7.6k in a short burst, showing coordinated conviction on the same side.
The market has dropped hard to 48¢ from their 53-60¢ entries, offering a better price than the original buyers got.

$7,627 on Over

96% win-rate sports bettor

A highly proven sports bettor with a 96% win rate and 1,874 resolved positions just bought Over after a sharp recent price drop, making this a strong copy-trade signal.

This bettor wins 96% of their trades across 1,874 resolved positions and is up $107k lifetime.
They regularly trade across many related sports markets, with 95 event bets tracked and the same 96% hit rate.
They bought Over at 59¢ after this market fell 18 points in a day, suggesting they see the recent drop as too far.

$3,457 on Over | Wallet win rate: 97%

Proven sharp buying Under

A proven profitable sports-style bettor with a 74% win rate sold Over at 56¢, which translates to buying Under around 44¢ in a liquid match total market.

This bettor has won 74% of 133 resolved markets and is up $89k overall.
Their average winning entry is 33¢, which suggests a habit of finding mispriced odds rather than chasing heavy favorites.
They sold Over at 56¢, which is equivalent to buying Under at 44¢ before Under moved up toward 48¢.

$3,122 on Under | Wallet win rate: 75%

Profitable serial sports bettor

A proven profitable sports-style trader with 133 resolved bets and a 74% win rate just put a $4.2k buy into Over, and the bet was large relative to this market's recent activity.

This bettor has won 74% of 133 resolved markets and is up about $89k overall.
They bought Over with a $4.2k order that was roughly 67% of this market's recent volume.
Their history spans 69 events and 81 markets, suggesting a repeatable cross-market betting edge.

$4,191 on Over | Wallet win rate: 75%

Top Holders

0x51eb...6bfa — Outcome 88361488, $5,844 (97% win rate)
0xf5d1...cdc9 — Outcome 88361488, $1,547 (60% win rate)
0x8873...09fc — Outcome 88361488, $1,059 (96% win rate)
0xd871...6bba — Outcome 88361488, $920 (85% win rate)
0xd092...342a — Outcome 88361488, $820
0x3b43...9e23 — Outcome 88361488, $541
0x9cf7...e5a5 — Outcome 88361488, $459
0xe168...e559 — Outcome 88361488, $403 (78% win rate)
0xce0f...5c9e — Outcome 88361488, $343
0x06a0...5804 — Outcome 88361488, $331

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

FC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 2.5

ResolvedFC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo - More Markets$18,397 tracked4 signalsSportsGamesSoccerLa Liga

In the upcoming La Liga game between FC Barcelona and RC Celta de Vigo, scheduled for April 22 at 3:30 PM ET: This market will resolve to "Over" if FC Barcelona and RC Celta de Vigo combine to score 3 or more goals in this game. If the combined total is less than 3, this market will resolve to "Under". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50–50. If the game is started but not completed, this market will resolve according to the official final score published on laliga.com. This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.