Part of: LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Bilibili Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend

LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $27,140.

Categories: Esports, Games, league of legends, Sports

Notable Trades

8-wallet sharp BLG cluster

Strong coordinated Bilibili flow from 8 wallets, including several profitable high-volume traders and a newly profitable wallet, hit before the market moved to 100%.

8 wallets put $15.5k on Bilibili in the same window, and the market later moved to 100¢.
Several wallets have strong records, including bettors up $200k, $120k, and $75k lifetime.
One 2-day-old wallet has already been flagged 9 times and is up $15.4k so far.

$15,550 on Bilibili Gaming

81% sharp caught early move

Sharp 81% win-rate serial cross-market bettor bought Ninjas in Pyjamas early at 25¢ before the market surged to 88¢ amid a large volume spike.

This bettor wins 81% of resolved bets and is up $272,935 lifetime.
They bought Ninjas in Pyjamas at 25¢ before the price jumped to 88¢.
This wallet is a serial cross-market trader across 123 events with an 81% hit rate.

$2,736 on Ninjas in Pyjamas | Wallet win rate: 94%

Profitable serial esports bettor

Profitable serial cross-market trader with a 77% resolved win rate is backing Bilibili amid a 102x pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 77% of resolved trades and is up $62,930 lifetime.
They have traded across 49 events and 91 markets, suggesting a repeatable edge rather than a one-off bet.
Market volume spiked 102x before the match, and this wallet is backing the 76% favorite at 77¢.

$1,154 on Bilibili Gaming | Wallet win rate: 73%

Profitable serial esports bettor

Profitable serial cross-market esports bettor with a 77% resolved win rate is putting $7.7K on Bilibili Gaming despite only a modest price edge signal.

This bettor wins 77% of resolved trades and is up $62.9K lifetime.
They have traded 90 markets across 48 events, suggesting a repeatable sports betting edge.
They put $7.7K on Bilibili at 77¢ in a relatively small Game 1 market.

$7,700 on Bilibili Gaming | Wallet win rate: 73%

Top Holders

0x2935...96f7 — Outcome 14054680, $22,590
0x56c9...0d9e — Outcome 14054680, $11,905 (92% win rate)
0xf070...ac55 — Outcome 14054680, $11,111 (94% win rate)
0x2307...3934 — Outcome 14054680, $9,157 (57% win rate)
0x52ec...a6f3 — Outcome 14054680, $7,458 (73% win rate)
0x6842...20d0 — Outcome 14054680, $6,957 (61% win rate)
0x84ad...bfb7 — Outcome 14054680, $6,689 (55% win rate)
0xad72...4f5e — Outcome 14054680, $5,000 (87% win rate)
0xb10b...0b04 — Outcome 14054680, $3,025 (87% win rate)
0xe6dd...edaf — Outcome 14054680, $2,526 (56% win rate)

Related Theses

Bilibili Gaming dominates Anyone's Legend

Covers 3 related markets

Gen.G sweeps KT Rolster

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

G2 defeats Movistar KOI

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 4 related markets

LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner

ResolvedLoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Bilibili Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$27,140 tracked4 signalsEsportsGamesleague of legendsSports

This market refers to the LoL match between Ninjas in Pyjamas and Bilibili Gaming in the LPL Group Ascend, initially scheduled for May 3 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Ninjas in Pyjamas" if Ninjas in Pyjamas win Game 1 against Bilibili Gaming. This market will resolve to "Bilibili Gaming" if Bilibili Gaming win Game 1 against Ninjas in Pyjamas. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.