This bettor has won 43 of 43 resolved trades and is up $2.56M lifetime They bought Under at 57¢ as market activity surged 126.9x above normal before the match Entry at 57¢ suggests they see the Under as meaningfully better than a coin flip in a liquid market

This bettor has won 68 of 68 resolved trades and is up $3.6M lifetime They trade across 39 markets in 34 events, suggesting a repeatable edge rather than a one-off bet They bought Under at 56¢ in a liquid FA Cup market, a clear directional position worth tracking

Part of: Manchester City FC vs. Liverpool FC - More Markets

Manchester City FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5

3 smart money signals detected, totaling $26,232.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, FA Cup

Notable Trades

Sharp trio buying Over

Three wallets piled into Over for nearly $12k, including two bettors with exceptional long-term results, making this coordinated sports buy worth watching.

Two of the three wallets have elite records: one wins 97% of bets and another wins 93%, with more than $598k combined profit.
Three wallets bought the same side within about 90 seconds, putting nearly $12k into Over at 43–44¢.
They entered before a 126.9x volume spike, and 43–44¢ implies they think this match clears 3.5 goals more often than the market does.

$11,934 on Over

43-0 sharp on Under

A bettor with a perfect 43-for-43 resolved record bought Under into a major pre-match volume spike, making this a strong sharp-money signal despite the modest ticket size.

This bettor has won 43 of 43 resolved trades and is up $2.56M lifetime
They bought Under at 57¢ as market activity surged 126.9x above normal before the match
Entry at 57¢ suggests they see the Under as meaningfully better than a coin flip in a liquid market

$2,238 on Under | Wallet win rate: 74%

68-0 sharp bettor

A proven sharp bettor with a perfect 68-for-68 resolved record and $3.6M in profit just put $12k on Under in a major soccer totals market.

This bettor has won 68 of 68 resolved trades and is up $3.6M lifetime
They trade across 39 markets in 34 events, suggesting a repeatable edge rather than a one-off bet
They bought Under at 56¢ in a liquid FA Cup market, a clear directional position worth tracking

$12,061 on Under | Wallet win rate: 99%

Top Holders

0xee0d...57ab — Outcome 90644957, $82,485 (99% win rate)
0x56fc...733e — Outcome 90644957, $4,478 (70% win rate)
0x8230...5121 — Outcome 90644957, $2,850 (75% win rate)
0x762e...4bf0 — Outcome 90644957, $1,681 (64% win rate)
0xc6a1...9fd5 — Outcome 90644957, $1,262
0x0176...910e — Outcome 90644957, $1,067 (86% win rate)
0xce2b...08fa — Outcome 90644957, $859 (83% win rate)
0xfd2f...37dd — Outcome 90644957, $450
0xe203...1b53 — Outcome 90644957, $308
0x1650...42f6 — Outcome 90644957, $284

Related Theses

Covers 2 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Manchester City FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5

ResolvedManchester City FC vs. Liverpool FC - More Markets$26,232 tracked3 signalsSportsGamesSoccerFA Cup

In the upcoming FA Cup game between Manchester City FC and Liverpool FC, scheduled for April 4 at 10:00 AM ET: This market will resolve to "Over" if Manchester City FC and Liverpool FC combine to score 4 or more goals in this game. If the combined total is less than 4, this market will resolve to "Under". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50–50. If the game is started but not completed, this market will resolve according to the official final score published on thefa.com. This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.