Part of: SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan - More Markets

SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $9,877.

Notable Trades

Sharp bettor fading collapse

A proven 75% winner bought Over before a sharp collapse from 28¢ to 12¢ in a major soccer totals market, making this a notable but higher-risk sharp entry to study.

This bettor wins 75% of resolved trades across 163 bets and is up about $6.5k lifetime
They bought Over at 28¢ in a liquid Serie A market just before the price fell to 12¢, showing real conviction against the move
The same wallet has traded 3 related markets in this event, suggesting a broader game script view rather than a random punt

$2,935 on Over | Wallet win rate: 75%

76% winner buys Under

A highly profitable serial cross-market bettor with a 76% win rate and $1.77M P&L is taking Under 1.5 at roughly 50¢, making this a notable sharp-bettor signal despite modest size in a liquid market.

This bettor wins 76% of their resolved trades and is up $1.77M lifetime
They have traded 260 markets across 208 events, which points to a repeatable edge rather than a one-off hit
Bought Under 1.5 at 50¢, a price that implies they see the low-scoring side as better than a coin flip

$1,209 on Under | Wallet win rate: 72%

Sharp trio piling into Under

Three wallets piled into Under together, including one with a 76% win rate and $1.77M profit and another winning 90% of resolved bets, before the price jumped from 39-50¢ to 52¢.

Two strong bettors led this move: one wins 76% of bets and is up $1.77M, while another has won 90% of 52 resolved markets.
All 3 wallets bought Under in the same match total market, and two got filled at 39¢ before the price moved to 52¢.
This trader group also shows a repeat cross-market pattern across 208 events, suggesting a systematic sports betting edge rather than a one-off play.

$4,072 on Under

90% win-rate soccer sharp

A high-performing bettor with a 90% win rate bought Under at 39¢ into a major pre-match volume spike, suggesting a potentially sharp entry before the market rebounded.

This bettor wins 90% of their resolved trades and is up $31.7k on $73.8k invested
They bought Under at 39¢, and the market is already up to 44¢ after the entry
Market activity spiked 151x above normal before kickoff, showing unusual attention around this line

$1,661 on Under | Wallet win rate: 72%

Top Holders

0x57ba...d369 — Outcome 10487192, $2,000
0x0def...4ddb — Outcome 10487192, $2,000 (100% win rate)
0xbcb8...2f90 — Outcome 10487192, $1,134
0x8566...c626 — Outcome 10487192, $1,003 (100% win rate)
0xf2f6...679e — Outcome 10487192, $1,001 (97% win rate)
0x9e19...1495 — Outcome 10487192, $1,000 (98% win rate)
0xd4aa...d40c — Outcome 10487192, $765
0xcfdd...b1a1 — Outcome 10487192, $761
0x57c6...fde6 — Outcome 10487192, $591
0xe550...4ebb — Outcome 10487192, $469 (98% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 5 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5

ResolvedSSC Napoli vs. AC Milan - More Markets$9,877 tracked4 signalsSportsGamesSoccersea

In the upcoming Serie A game between SSC Napoli and AC Milan, scheduled for April 6 at 2:45 PM ET: This market will resolve to "Over" if SSC Napoli and AC Milan combine to score 2 or more goals in this game. If the combined total is less than 2, this market will resolve to "Under". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50–50. If the game is started but not completed, this market will resolve according to the official final score published on legaseriea.it. This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.