This bettor wins 92% of resolved bets and is up about $269k lifetime. They already have $13.3k on Quentin Halys and just added more at 74¢. Halys is now around 76¢, so the trade is still close to the bettor’s entry.

Part of: Swiss Open: Federico Cina vs Quentin Halys

Swiss Open: Federico Cina vs Quentin Halys

8 smart money signals detected, totaling $124,608.

Categories: Tennis, Sports, Games

Notable Trades

Five-wallet tennis surge

Five profitable/high-volume wallets put nearly $60k into Federico Cina during a major pre-match volume spike, pushing the market up about 11.5 percentage points.

Five wallets bought the same side for nearly $60k, with the biggest bettor adding $45k at 50¢.
This market saw a 163x pre-event volume spike and Cina has already moved up 11.5 points.
Several wallets have strong records, including one up $20.1M lifetime and another winning 80% of resolved bets.

$59,870 on Federico Cina

90% sports sharp on Halys

Proven profitable sports bettor with a 90% record is backing Halys, alongside a sharp pre-event volume spike and early favorable price movement.

This bettor wins 90% of resolved trades and is up $72k lifetime at roughly 50¢ average entries.
They are a serial sports trader across 52 events, with the same 90% hit rate over that history.
They bought Halys at 50¢ and the market has already moved to about 54¢.

$2,492 on Quentin Halys | Wallet win rate: 88%

90% sports sharp on Halys

Proven profitable sports bettor with a 90% record is backing Halys, alongside a sharp pre-event volume spike and early favorable price movement.

This bettor wins 90% of resolved trades and is up $72k lifetime at roughly 50¢ average entries.
They are a serial sports trader across 52 events, with the same 90% hit rate over that history.
They bought Halys at 50¢ and the market has already moved to about 54¢.

$2,225 on Quentin Halys | Wallet win rate: 88%

Profitable new tennis whale

A 6-day-old wallet with early profits is adding to Federico Cina at 32¢ amid a major volume spike and sharp price move upward.

This new wallet is already up $9.6K and has won all 5 resolved bets so far.
They bought Federico Cina at 32¢ before the market moved to about 55¢.
Market volume spiked 44x and Cina’s price jumped 18 points, backing up the move.

$2,500 on Federico Cina | Wallet win rate: 89%

92% sharp adding

Proven sharp sports bettor with a 92% win rate is adding to an existing Quentin Halys position at 74¢.

This bettor wins 92% of resolved bets and is up about $269k lifetime.
They already have $13.3k on Quentin Halys and just added more at 74¢.
Halys is now around 76¢, so the trade is still close to the bettor’s entry.

$1,033 on Quentin Halys | Wallet win rate: 62%

Sharp-led Halys steam

A strong one-sided Halys move was led by a highly profitable 98% bettor and coincided with a huge pre-event volume spike before the market moved to 100%.

A bettor with a 98% record and $1.4M profit bought about $49K of Quentin Halys around 41–45¢.
Three wallets all moved the same way for $51K total during a 205x volume spike.
The market has since moved to 100%, suggesting this was sharp in-play or result-driven tennis flow.

$51,232 on Quentin Halys

99% win-rate tennis sharp

Elite sports bettor with a massive 99% resolved win rate and $15.4M profit bought Federico Cina at 48¢.

This bettor wins 99% of resolved trades and is up $15.4M lifetime.
They have traded across 285 events with a 99% hit rate, suggesting a repeatable sports edge.
Entry at 48¢ is near even money, so the bet implies Cina is meaningfully underrated.

$3,600 on Federico Cina | Wallet win rate: 99%

91% win-rate tennis sharp

Elite sports bettor with a 91% historical win rate and $2.34M profit is buying Federico Cina at 46¢ in a relatively small tennis market.

This bettor wins 91% of resolved trades and is up $2.34M lifetime.
They have bet across 218 sports events with the same 91% hit rate, suggesting a repeatable edge.
Entry at 46¢ is below the current 48% market price, giving a slightly better copy point.

$1,656 on Federico Cina | Wallet win rate: 92%

Top Holders

0x4be1...aa70 — Outcome 74317563, $90,551 (64% win rate)
0xc3c3...eec8 — Outcome 74317563, $15,000 (99% win rate)
0xfe78...0319 — Outcome 74317563, $8,247 (65% win rate)
0x9c76...c926 — Outcome 74317563, $7,200 (92% win rate)
0x5505...aa44 — Outcome 74317563, $4,100
0xf916...e770 — Outcome 74317563, $2,689 (88% win rate)
0xc34b...9296 — Outcome 74317563, $2,500 (96% win rate)
0x7300...e52c — Outcome 74317563, $2,059
0x0e50...2609 — Outcome 74317563, $1,596 (97% win rate)
0x74ab...ee2b — Outcome 74317563, $1,502 (89% win rate)

Related Theses

T1 wins in five

Covers 4 related markets

Liberty win low-scoring matchup

Covers 5 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Blue Jays Orioles go over

Covers 1 related market

Whitecaps fail to win

Covers 1 related market

Marlins beat Blue Jays

Covers 1 related market

Nationals beat the Phillies

Covers 1 related market

Mariners will beat Giants

Covers 1 related market

Bernet beats Dellien in Trieste

Covers 1 related market

Swiss Open: Federico Cina vs Quentin Halys

ResolvedSwiss Open: Federico Cina vs Quentin Halys$124,608 tracked8 signalsTennisSportsGames

This market refers to the tennis match between Federico Cina and Quentin Halys in the Swiss Open, originally scheduled for July 14, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Federico Cina' if Federico Cina advances against Quentin Halys. This market will resolve to 'Quentin Halys' if Quentin Halys advances against Federico Cina. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.