Part of: LoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs

Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 1?

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $45,369.

Categories: Esports, league of legends, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Repeat whale on Under

A repeat large bettor took a $20.6k Under position in a relatively quiet esports market while also placing $42k across three related match markets, despite no proven long-term edge.

A repeat large bettor put $20.6k on Under, far larger than this market’s $11.1k 24h volume.
They are positioning across 3 markets in the same match with $42k total exposure.
Entry around 47¢ suggests they see Under as mispriced versus the current mid-40s odds.

$20,621 on Under | Wallet win rate: 57%

Repeat whale on quiet market

A repeatedly flagged wallet is making a large, concentrated Under bet in a relatively quiet esports market, with additional positioning across the same match despite an unproven historical record.

This wallet put $17.1k on Under, a very large bet for this market’s recent activity.
The same bettor has placed $38.4k across 3 markets tied to this match, suggesting a focused event-level view.
Entry around 47¢ is close to the current 46¢ price, so the copy price has not run away.

$17,089 on Under | Wallet win rate: 57%

81% sharp on thin market

A highly proven esports bettor with an 81% record and nearly $379k profit bought Under in a very quiet market, with serial cross-market activity backing the signal.

This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $379k lifetime.
They put $3.3k on Under in a market with only $883 of 24h volume.
This wallet has traded 50 related markets across 43 events while maintaining the same 81% hit rate.

$3,330 on Under | Wallet win rate: 83%

Profitable esports specialist

Profitable serial esports bettor with a 63% resolved win rate is making a large Over bet that dwarfs the market’s 24h volume while also backing LGD in the same match.

This bettor is up $210K lifetime across 156 resolved bets.
They have traded 90 related events for $653K total, showing a consistent cross-market esports pattern.
The $3.2K Over bet is over 3.6x this market’s entire 24h volume.

$4,330 on Over | Wallet win rate: 53%

Top Holders

0x224b...1050 — Outcome 76075467, $105
0x41f0...221e — Outcome 76075467, $105
0x5d78...7b8d — Outcome 76075467, $95 (94% win rate)
0xc406...2ad5 — Outcome 76075467, $91
0x3e6d...2671 — Outcome 76075467, $36 (23% win rate)
0x8982...af89 — Outcome 76075467, $10 (71% win rate)
0xba17...92b4 — Outcome 76075467, $10
0xde6e...8f9f — Outcome 76075467, $6
0x6b22...cbac — Outcome 76075467, $5
0xb232...771d — Outcome 76075467, $5

Related Theses

LGD wins games two through four

Covers 3 related markets

T1 takes Game 2, Gen.G wins

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Dplus KIA beats KT Rolster

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Covers 2 related markets

Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 1?

ResolvedLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$45,369 tracked4 signalsEsportsleague of legendsGamesSports

In the upcoming Lower bracket round 1 match between ThunderTalk Gaming and LGD Gaming in the LPL Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 2 at 5:00AM ET: This market is about the total kills in Game 1. This market will resolve to "Over" if the total kills in Game 1 is 25 or more. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Under". If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date, this market will resolve to 50-50. If Game 1 is never played due to forfeit, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50. If Game 1 begins but is not completed, this market will resolve to 50-50. If Game 1 is remade, resolution will be based on the total kills in the remade game only. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.