Part of: Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

This market refers to the Valorant Lower Bracket Round 1 match between 100 Thieves and Nongshim RedForce in the VCT Champions Playoffs, initially scheduled for October 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "100 Thieves" if 100 Thieves win the match against Nongshim RedForce. This market will resolve to "Nongshim RedForce" if Nongshim RedForce win the match against 100 Thieves. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before October 23, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of October 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.

7 smart money signals detected, totaling $124,152.

Categories: Esports, Valorant, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Repeat new-wallet whale scaling up

A 10-day-old wallet has repeatedly placed large bets and is adding another $50.8K to an existing 100 Thieves position, though its two-win record is too small to establish an edge.

  • This 10-day-old wallet has made nine flagged bets totaling $241K and is adding $50.8K to its existing position.
  • The wallet is up about $29.9K, but that comes from only two resolved bets, so its track record is still unproven.

$50,758 on 100 Thieves | Wallet win rate: 54%

Five-wallet esports buying cluster

Five wallets put $63,875 behind 100 Thieves, including a profitable bettor with 2,183 resolved trades and a whale adding to an existing position.

  • Five wallets bought $63,875 of 100 Thieves, a concentrated push that exceeds the reported 24-hour market volume.
  • One bettor in the group has a 76% win rate across 2,183 resolved trades and is up $3.1 million lifetime.
  • The largest buyer added $50,758 to an existing position worth about $76,000, showing substantial continued conviction.

$57,875 on 100 Thieves

81% winner scaling a position

A profitable trader with an 81% win rate across 226 resolved bets added $6,000 to an existing position amid a 70.5x volume spike.

  • This bettor has won 81% of 226 resolved bets and is up $92,177 overall.
  • They added $6,000 to an existing 100 Thieves position, showing increased conviction.
  • Trading activity was 70.5 times the market’s historical average during the scan window.

$6,000 on 100 Thieves | Wallet win rate: 80%

Profitable serial bettor backs the underdog

A highly profitable bettor with 2,061 resolved trades is buying the underdog at 36¢ amid a 70.5× pre-event volume spike.

  • This bettor has won 69% of 2,061 resolved trades and is up $463,593 overall.
  • They bought Nongshim RedForce at 36¢ as market activity spiked 70.5× above its historical average.
  • The wallet has traded across 28 events, adding a broad track record to this underdog position.

$1,700 on Nongshim RedForce | Wallet win rate: 69%

Proven bettor adding to 100 Thieves

A proven bettor with an 84% win rate and substantial profit added to a 100 Thieves position during a 70.5x volume spike.

  • This bettor has won 21 of 25 resolved positions and is up $58,008.
  • They added $3,889 to 100 Thieves at 65¢, already holding a $5,983 position.
  • Market volume was 70.5 times its historical average, adding weight to the move.

$3,889 on 100 Thieves | Wallet win rate: 90%

96% winner adding to position

A highly profitable bettor with a 96% win rate and substantial historical edge is adding to their 100 Thieves position.

  • This bettor has won 72 of 75 resolved positions and is up $64,930.
  • They are adding another $2,830 to 100 Thieves at 65¢, on top of an existing position.
  • They have placed bets across 59 events and 60 markets, showing a sustained record beyond this match.

$2,830 on 100 Thieves | Wallet win rate: 73%

Proven 83% winner backs 100 Thieves

A highly profitable bettor with 1,886 resolved trades and an 83% win rate is backing 100 Thieves, with a long history of cross-market activity.

  • This bettor has won 83% of 1,886 resolved trades and is up over $5 million.
  • They placed a $1,099 bet on 100 Thieves at 63¢, consistent with their long-running cross-market activity.
  • The market is liquid, and the current ask remains near their entry price.

$1,099 on 100 Thieves | Wallet win rate: 84%

Related Theses

FUT wins in three maps

Covers 3 related markets

FUT sweeps EDward Gaming

Covers 3 related markets

Monte beats paiN

Covers 4 related markets

G2 sweeps BIG

Covers 3 related markets

TYLOO sweeps 9z

Covers 3 related markets

FUT wins in three maps

Covers 4 related markets

Falcons sweep G2 convincingly

Covers 4 related markets

Spirit sweeps Natus Vincere

Covers 3 related markets

B8 and Mongolz split maps

Covers 3 related markets

Hanwha Life dominates T1

Covers 4 related markets

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs$124,152 tracked7 signalsEsportsValorantGamesSports
100 Thieves
100¢
Nongshim RedForce
0¢

This market refers to the Valorant Lower Bracket Round 1 match between 100 Thieves and Nongshim RedForce in the VCT Champions Playoffs, initially scheduled for October 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "100 Thieves" if 100 Thieves win the match against Nongshim RedForce. This market will resolve to "Nongshim RedForce" if Nongshim RedForce win the match against 100 Thieves. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before October 23, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of October 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.

Notable Trades

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 12:19 UTC

$50,758 on 100 Thieves at 67¢

67¢→100¢↑33¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 12:12 UTC

$57,875 on 100 Thieves at 67¢

67¢→100¢↑33¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 11:56 UTC

$6,000 on 100 Thieves at 65¢

65¢→100¢↑35¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 12:12 UTC

$1,700 on Nongshim RedForce at 36¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 12:00 UTC

$3,889 on 100 Thieves at 65¢

65¢→100¢↑35¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 11:44 UTC

$2,830 on 100 Thieves at 65¢

65¢→100¢↑35¢

Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs

2026-10-09 07:51 UTC

$1,099 on 100 Thieves at 63¢

63¢→100¢↑37¢

Related Theses

FUT wins in three maps
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Counter-Strike: B8 vs FUT Espo…Counter-Strike: B8 vs FUT Espo…Counter-Strike: B8 vs FUT Espo…
FUT sweeps EDward Gaming
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs FUT…Map Handicap: FUT (-1.5) vs ED…Valorant: EDward Gaming vs FUT…
Monte beats paiN
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 4 related markets
Counter-Strike: Monte vs paiN …Counter-Strike: Monte vs paiN …Map Handicap: MNTE (-1.5) vs p…
G2 sweeps BIG
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Counter-Strike: G2 vs BIG - Ma…Counter-Strike: G2 vs BIG (BO3…Map Handicap: G2 (-1.5) vs BIG…
TYLOO sweeps 9z
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs 9z - …Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs 9z (B…Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs 9z - …
FUT wins in three maps
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 4 related markets
Valorant: FUT Esports vs NRG (…Games Total: O/U 2.5Valorant: FUT Esports vs NRG -…
Falcons sweep G2 convincingly
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 4 related markets
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons v…Counter-Strike: Team Falcons v…Counter-Strike: Team Falcons v…
Spirit sweeps Natus Vincere
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere …Map Handicap: TS (-1.5) vs Nat…Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere …
B8 and Mongolz split maps
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 3 related markets
Counter-Strike: TheMongolz vs …Games Total: O/U 2.5Counter-Strike: TheMongolz vs …
Hanwha Life dominates T1
Wallet_0xcf609 trades 4 related markets
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1…LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1…LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1…