Part of: Bologna FC 1909 vs. Cagliari Calcio

Will Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-05-03?

10 smart money signals detected, totaling $59,309.

Notable Trades

Sharp 8-wallet NO cluster

Strong 8-wallet NO cluster with linked funding, proven sharp wallets, and late live-sport timing drove a major move from roughly mid-50s entry to 96%.

Several proven bettors joined the same side, including wallets with 100%, 89%, and 85% records on resolved positions.
Eight wallets bought $26.5k of No, with 3 linked wallets accounting for $20.8k of the flow.
The cluster entered around the mid-50¢ range and No has since moved to 96¢, showing the market followed their view.

$26,526 on No

44-0 serial sports sharp

A proven sharp wallet with a 44-0 resolved record and $161k profit is buying No on Bologna despite only a modest trade size.

This bettor is 44-for-44 on resolved positions and up $161k lifetime.
They have traded 52 markets across 42 events with a perfect resolved record.
Buying No at 61¢ follows a 14-point drop in Bologna’s odds today.

$1,244 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%

New wallet last-minute NO

New wallet made a $9.8k last-minute live soccer bet on No, with repeat large-bet flags totaling $13.2k despite no resolved track record yet.

A new wallet put $9.8k on No in the final 2 minutes of a live soccer market.
This wallet has now triggered 3 large-bet alerts totaling $13.2k.
Entry at 58¢ suggests they are backing Bologna not to win near resolution.

$9,801 on No | Wallet win rate: 88%

New wallet late No bet

A new wallet placed an $8.4k No bet minutes before the scheduled match cutoff, suggesting fresh pre-game or live information despite no track record.

A new wallet put $8.4k on No just 2 minutes before the market cutoff.
The bet backs Bologna not winning at 58¢, while the market has already moved against Bologna by 10 points today.
This is a fresh position with meaningful size, but the wallet has no resolved track record yet.

$8,352 on No | Wallet win rate: 88%

Profitable new linked wallet

High-score alert from a repeat new wallet with early profits and linked-wallet backing buying Bologna despite recent odds weakness.

This new bettor is already up $12.9K and has been flagged 15 times for large bets.
Three linked wallets share the same funder and have put $20.8K into related flagged trades.
Buying Yes at 45¢ goes against a 13-point weekly drop, suggesting a contrarian view on Bologna.

$5,305 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 100%

Profitable serial bettor

Profitable high-volume bettor bought Bologna No near 50¢, and the position has already moved to 55¢ despite the alert being driven mainly by cross-market history.

This bettor has won 67% of over 11,000 resolved bets and is up $2.6M lifetime.
They have traded across 293 events with $1.7M in cross-market volume, showing a long-running sports betting pattern.
Entry at 50¢ has already moved to 55¢, suggesting early confirmation from the market.

$1,232 on No | Wallet win rate: 62%

89% win-rate soccer sharp

Sharp serial cross-market bettor with an 89% resolved win rate is buying Bologna No at roughly even odds.

This bettor wins 89% of resolved trades and is up $52.9K lifetime.
They have traded across 45 events with the same 89% success rate, suggesting a repeatable sports edge.
Entry at 49¢ is near even money, implying they see Bologna failing to win as underpriced.

$1,230 on No | Wallet win rate: 91%

Sharp soccer bettor buys No

A profitable sports bettor with an 85% record and strong edge is buying Bologna No at near-even odds.

This bettor has won 85% of resolved trades and is up $15.1K lifetime.
Their past wins came around 48¢ average odds, suggesting a real edge on near-even markets.
Buying No at 49¢ implies they see Bologna as less likely to win than the market suggests.

$2,339 on No | Wallet win rate: 96%

New profitable sports bettor

A 10-day-old repeat bettor with a 9-0 resolved record and $8.2k profit is adding another Bologna NO position, though the individual trade is modest in a liquid market.

This new bettor is 9-for-9 on resolved bets and up $8.2k so far.
They have now been flagged 16 times, with $30.5k total in notable positions.
Buying No at 49¢ implies they see Bologna as overpriced near even odds.

$1,302 on No | Wallet win rate: 92%

Perfect-record serial bettor

A proven serial cross-market bettor with a perfect 43-0 resolved record is buying Bologna NO at 48¢.

This bettor has won 43 of 43 resolved positions and is up $146k lifetime.
They have traded 46 markets across 36 events with a perfect resolved record so far.
Buying No at 48¢ implies they see Bologna as less likely than the market's near-coinflip price.

$1,977 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%

Top Holders

0x9495...9a27 — Outcome 10475387, $11,835 (64% win rate)
0xff6e...18ec — Outcome 10475387, $11,789 (100% win rate)
0xdb85...152f — Outcome 10475387, $9,433 (73% win rate)
0xdb63...7fb5 — Outcome 10475387, $5,000 (100% win rate)
0x7402...8020 — Outcome 10475387, $4,000 (64% win rate)
0x4a8d...31ea — Outcome 10475387, $2,792 (98% win rate)
0x6323...9fee — Outcome 10475387, $2,254 (94% win rate)
0xde1d...c645 — Outcome 10475387, $1,744
0xba81...dc35 — Outcome 10475387, $1,506 (93% win rate)
0xc1b6...c914 — Outcome 10475387, $1,337 (55% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Will Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-05-03?

ResolvedBologna FC 1909 vs. Cagliari Calcio$59,309 tracked10 signalsSportsGamesSoccersea

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 3, 2026 If Bologna FC 1909 wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.