Part of: Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC

Will Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?

5 smart money signals detected, totaling $28,252.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, Premier League, EPL

Notable Trades

Elite sports sharp buying No

Elite profitable sports bettor with 86% win rate and $1.0M lifetime profit is buying No across this Chelsea-Tottenham event.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved trades and is up about $1.0M lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader, with activity across 233 events and an 86% win rate.
They bought $3.7K of No at 77¢, adding to an $18K same-event thesis.

$3,689 on No | Wallet win rate: 86%

86% sharp sports bettor

A highly profitable sharp sports bettor with an 86% historical win rate bought No on the draw at 70%, alongside cross-market positioning and a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved trades and is up over $1.0M lifetime.
They bought No at 70%, and the market has already moved to 76% in their favor.
This is part of a broader same-event position across 3 markets, with volume running 63x above normal.

$6,743 on No | Wallet win rate: 86%

Profitable serial sports bettor

Profitable serial cross-market bettor bought the draw at 30¢ during a major pre-event volume spike, though the market has since moved against the entry.

This bettor is up $456k across 367 resolved trades, with nearly $3.7M invested.
Market volume spiked 64x above normal before the match, suggesting unusually strong attention here.
They bought the draw at 30¢, above the current 24¢ price, implying a contrarian view that the draw is underpriced.

$3,964 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 57%

Profitable serial trader cluster

High-scoring one-sided draw buying led by a very profitable serial cross-market sports trader, with a 205x pre-event volume spike and three wallets aligned on Yes.

A bettor up $3.48M lifetime is part of this draw-buying cluster and has traded 594 markets across 384 events.
Three wallets put $12.7K on the draw, all effectively buying Yes around 28¢.
Volume spiked 205x above normal, and the draw price has already moved up 5.5% over the week.

$12,710 on Yes

Profitable new sports wallet

A 5-day-old wallet with a perfect early record and positive P&L is making another sizable No bet against the draw.

This new bettor is 5-for-5 so far and up $1,450 lifetime.
The wallet is only 5 days old but has already made repeat flagged bets totaling $2,236.
They are buying No at 75¢, meaning they see the draw as less likely than the market implies.

$1,146 on No | Wallet win rate: 100%

Top Holders

0x6d11...c449 — Outcome 79826978, $31,983 (57% win rate)
0x7469...cbc5 — Outcome 79826978, $20,109
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 10622834, $6,995
0xb184...b6c6 — Outcome 79826978, $3,276 (77% win rate)
0x4a44...8985 — Outcome 79826978, $3,200 (38% win rate)
0x625d...c6a1 — Outcome 79826978, $2,900 (81% win rate)
0x2f0b...5577 — Outcome 79826978, $2,564 (88% win rate)
0xafac...8730 — Outcome 79826978, $2,273 (89% win rate)
0xf5d1...cdc9 — Outcome 79826978, $2,000 (59% win rate)
0xfd43...cd41 — Outcome 10622834, $2,000 (79% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 1 related market

O'Higgins won't win match

Covers 1 related market

Will Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?

ResolvedChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC$28,252 tracked5 signalsSportsGamesSoccerPremier LeagueEPL

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 19, 2026 If the game ends in a draw, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve to "Yes". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.