Part of: Deportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid

Will Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-23?

15 smart money signals detected, totaling $89,881.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, La Liga

Notable Trades

Profitable last-minute sports timer

Profitable serial near-resolution sports bettor bought No 1.6 minutes before resolution, matching a repeated last-minute edge pattern.

This bettor has made 37 near-resolution bets across 34 markets and is up $369K lifetime.
They entered just 1.6 minutes before resolution, suggesting a live-information edge.
The $5K buy on No comes as Alavés Yes had already moved up 8 points today.

$5,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 60%

Sharp four-wallet YES cluster

Four wallets bought the same side shortly before the match, including two highly profitable bettors, alongside a 10x pre-event volume spike and rising Yes odds.

Two profitable bettors joined this move, including one up $3.7M lifetime and another up $351K.
Four wallets bought the same side for $14.2K, all effectively entering Yes around 44¢.
Market volume is running 10x above normal and Yes is up 7 points today.

$14,162 on Yes

96% winner leads Yes cluster

High-score alert with a proven 96% winning bettor and three-wallet one-sided flow buying Yes ahead of the match.

A bettor who wins 96% of resolved trades is backing this side and is up $3.8M lifetime.
Three wallets put $25.7K on the same Yes outcome, including a $10.8K buy from the sharpest wallet.
Entry around 43¢ implies roughly a 2.3x payout if Deportivo Alavés wins.

$25,681 on Yes

80% sharp sports bettor

Sharp sports bettor with an 80% record and $230k lifetime profit is buying No on Alavés at 60¢.

This bettor wins 80% of resolved bets and is up $230,589 lifetime.
They have traded across 125 events, suggesting a repeatable sports edge rather than a one-off bet.
Entry at 60¢ implies they see Alavés failing to win as meaningfully underpriced.

$3,084 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%

Elite sports sharp buying No

Proven sharp sports bettor with an 86% win rate and over $1M profit bought No on Alavés despite a liquid market.

This bettor wins 86% of resolved trades and is up $1.05M lifetime.
They have traded 251 related sports events with the same 86% win rate.
Entry at 60¢ suggests they see Alavés failing to win as meaningfully underpriced.

$4,547 on No | Wallet win rate: 56%

Three profitable wallets on No

Three profitable, high-volume wallets are buying No together, including two bettors with 80%+ win rates and large lifetime profits.

Two wallets in this cluster win 80%+ of resolved bets and are up a combined $1.28M lifetime.
All 3 wallets bought the same side within minutes, totaling $9.1K on No.
These are serial cross-market sports traders with hundreds of prior events and strong long-term results.

$9,089 on No

Profitable serial sports trader

Highly profitable serial cross-market trader with a massive track record is buying No, though the individual stake is modest in a liquid market.

This bettor has won 64% of over 15,000 resolved bets and is up $3.7M lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader, active across 395 events with $2.4M tracked in this pattern.
They bought No at 58¢, aligning with the market favorite and implying confidence Alavés does not win.

$1,027 on No | Wallet win rate: 61%

Profitable serial sports trader

Massively profitable serial cross-market sports bettor bought No despite only a modest single trade in a liquid market.

This bettor has won 64% of 15,205 resolved bets and is up $3.7M lifetime.
They have traded across 394 events and $2.4M of cross-market volume, suggesting a repeatable sports-betting process.
Entry at 58¢ backs Alavés not winning, with current market depth making this easy to follow.

$2,050 on No | Wallet win rate: 61%

$3.7M profitable sports regular

Profitable high-volume serial cross-market trader with $3.7M lifetime P&L is buying No in a liquid soccer market, despite only a modest trade size.

This bettor is up $3.7M across more than 15,000 resolved bets.
They have traded 607 markets across 394 events, suggesting a repeatable sports process.
Buying No at 58¢ implies they see Alavés as less likely to win than the market price suggests.

$1,384 on No | Wallet win rate: 61%

Profitable serial bettor

A highly profitable serial cross-market bettor with a large resolved sample bought No on a liquid soccer market, supported by a pre-event volume spike.

This bettor is up $3.7M lifetime across more than 15,000 resolved trades.
They have traded 607 markets across 394 events, suggesting a repeatable sports-betting process.
They bought No at 58¢ as pre-game volume spiked 11x above its usual pace.

$1,297 on No | Wallet win rate: 61%

Top Holders

0x3fd9...1ef0 — Outcome 63338859, $194,507 (95% win rate)
0xc3c3...eec8 — Outcome 63338859, $30,000 (99% win rate)
0x19e2...ce3c — Outcome 63338859, $28,051 (46% win rate)
0x83d2...d196 — Outcome 63338859, $21,896 (97% win rate)
0xec8d...dd71 — Outcome 63338859, $9,490 (74% win rate)
0x27f7...44b0 — Outcome 63338859, $8,148 (88% win rate)
0xf421...cff4 — Outcome 63338859, $6,559 (97% win rate)
0x5c74...4ef0 — Outcome 63338859, $3,238 (94% win rate)
0x3837...c6b0 — Outcome 63338859, $2,000 (100% win rate)
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 11181843, $1,846

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Will Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-23?

ResolvedDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid$89,881 tracked15 signalsSportsGamesSoccerLa Liga

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 23, 2026 If Deportivo Alavés wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.