Part of: Houston Dynamo vs. Real Salt Lake

Will Houston Dynamo win on 2026-09-09?

In the upcoming game, scheduled for September 9, 2026 If Houston Dynamo wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.

11 smart money signals detected, totaling $416,601.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, MLS

Notable Trades

Elite sharp backing Houston

A highly profitable bettor with 8,264 resolved trades and a substantial edge is buying Houston Dynamo at 54%.

This bettor wins 84% of trades across 8,264 resolved positions and is up $1.2 million.
Their results exceed the implied odds of their entries by 26%, indicating a genuine long-term edge.
They are buying Yes at 54% with $1,944 of fresh exposure.

$1,944 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 86%

Profitable serial trader buys No

A highly experienced, profitable serial trader made a large fresh bet on No at 50% in a very quiet market, indicating meaningful conviction despite only moderate historical edge.

This bettor has won 66% of 28,923 resolved trades and is up $7.18 million lifetime.
The $11,322 No bet was over 13,000% of the detected 24-hour volume, showing unusually strong conviction in a quiet market.
The trade was placed at 50¢ while No currently trades around 52¢, implying an estimated near-even outcome with a favorable entry.

$3,081 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%

Three-wallet No cluster before volume surge

A coordinated three-wallet No position and an extreme volume spike make this a notable directional sports trade despite the lead wallet's merely market-rate win record.

Three wallets are aligned on No, committing nearly $9,900 to the same outcome.
The market saw a 44,000x historical volume spike, suggesting unusually concentrated attention before the game.
The lead bettor has won 49,626 of 70,548 resolved trades and entered No at 47¢.

$6,776 on No | Wallet win rate: 70%

59-0 bettor scales into Yes

A proven 59-0 bettor added roughly $149,000 to an existing Yes position during an extreme pre-event volume spike.

This bettor has won all 59 resolved trades and is up $2.16 million, with an average winning entry near 50¢.
They added about $149,000 to Houston Yes at 52¢–54¢ while already holding a $392,000 position.
Market activity was more than 39,000 times its historical average, and the price has risen from the bettor’s entry to 55¢.

$68,079 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 100%

59-0 bettor scales into Yes

A proven 59-0 bettor added roughly $149,000 to an existing Yes position during an extreme pre-event volume spike.

This bettor has won all 59 resolved trades and is up $2.16 million, with an average winning entry near 50¢.
They added about $149,000 to Houston Yes at 52¢–54¢ while already holding a $392,000 position.
Market activity was more than 39,000 times its historical average, and the price has risen from the bettor’s entry to 55¢.

$148,735 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 100%

Three-wallet No cluster before volume surge

A coordinated three-wallet No position and an extreme volume spike make this a notable directional sports trade despite the lead wallet's merely market-rate win record.

Three wallets are aligned on No, committing nearly $9,900 to the same outcome.
The market saw a 44,000x historical volume spike, suggesting unusually concentrated attention before the game.
The lead bettor has won 49,626 of 70,548 resolved trades and entered No at 47¢.

$1,196 on No | Wallet win rate: 70%

Four-wallet Houston Yes cluster

A four-wallet cluster committed $165,560 to Yes, including a bettor with a perfect 59-0 record, alongside an extreme volume spike and a current price still near entry.

Four wallets bought Yes for $165,560, more than twice the market's prior 24-hour volume.
The largest bettor is 59-0 with $2.16 million in profit, although it is adding to an existing Yes position.
Volume surged to roughly 19,960 times its historical average while Yes moved from about 52¢ to 55¢.

$165,560 on Yes

Sharp bettor scaling into coordinated No

A proven 75% win-rate trader is adding to a No position amid an extreme volume spike and coordinated three-wallet No buying.

This bettor has won 77 of 102 trades (75%) and earned $46,622 in profit.
They are adding to an existing No position while three wallets collectively bought nearly $9,900 of No.
The market saw a 44,153x historical volume spike, making the coordinated downside positioning especially notable.

$2,387 on No | Wallet win rate: 73%

Three-wallet No cluster before volume surge

A coordinated three-wallet No position and an extreme volume spike make this a notable directional sports trade despite the lead wallet's merely market-rate win record.

Three wallets are aligned on No, committing nearly $9,900 to the same outcome.
The market saw a 44,000x historical volume spike, suggesting unusually concentrated attention before the game.
The lead bettor has won 49,626 of 70,548 resolved trades and entered No at 47¢.

$3,996 on No | Wallet win rate: 70%

Three-wallet No buying surge

Three wallets are buying No alongside a dramatic pre-event volume spike, creating a meaningful coordinated signal despite this wallet's weak track record and existing position.

Three wallets are aligned on No, committing nearly $9,900 to the same outcome.
Trading volume spiked more than 44,000 times its historical average ahead of the match.
This wallet is adding to an existing No position at 47¢, though its 46% win rate makes the broader coordination more important than its individual record.

$3,525 on No | Wallet win rate: 46%