This bettor has won 93 of 93 resolved trades and is up $436,986 overall They have traded 155 markets across 142 events, suggesting a repeatable edge rather than a one-off hit They bought No at 73¢ with $12.9k, a sizable position in a match market with heavy pregame activity

Part of: Lille OSC vs. Racing Club de Lens

Will Lille OSC vs. Racing Club de Lens end in a draw?

4 smart money signals detected, totaling $27,377.

Categories: Sports, Soccer, Ligue 1, Games

Notable Trades

Serial timer cluster on Draw

Four wallets piled into Draw at 28-29¢ right around resolution, led by a proven near-resolution bettor with strong profits and backed by two other highly profitable wallets.

Four wallets all bought Draw at 28-29¢ for $7.9k total within minutes of resolution
One wallet has a pattern of last-minute bets with a +34% edge and $128.9k profit across 16 near-resolution trades
Two other wallets are up $506k and $971k lifetime, which adds credibility to the one-sided move

$7,875 on Yes

93-0 sports sharp

A high-volume sports bettor with a perfect 93-for-93 resolved record and over $436k profit just put $12.9k on No, making this a strong copy-trade signal despite the market itself being liquid.

This bettor has won 93 of 93 resolved trades and is up $436,986 overall
They have traded 155 markets across 142 events, suggesting a repeatable edge rather than a one-off hit
They bought No at 73¢ with $12.9k, a sizable position in a match market with heavy pregame activity

$12,900 on No | Wallet win rate: 99%

92-0 sharp sports bettor

A perfect-record sports bettor with 92 resolved wins and over $436k profit is buying No at 72¢ in this match-draw market, making this a strong copy-trade signal despite the modest ticket size.

This bettor has won 92 of 92 resolved markets and is up about $437k overall
They trade heavily across sports markets with more than $1.1M deployed over 155 markets
Bought No at 72¢, meaning they likely see the draw chance as meaningfully below the current 28% Yes price

$2,402 on No | Wallet win rate: 99%

92-0 sharp sports bettor

A bettor with a perfect 92-for-92 resolved record and over $436k profit just bought No at 72¢ into a sharp pre-match volume surge, making this a strong copy-trade candidate despite the market's decent liquidity.

This bettor has won 92 of 92 resolved markets and is up about $437k on roughly $1.01M invested
They trade across 154 markets in 141 events with a perfect record, which makes this look like a repeatable edge rather than a one-off bet
They just put $4.2k on No at 72¢ as volume ran 463x above normal before kickoff

$4,200 on No | Wallet win rate: 99%

Top Holders

0xfe78...0319 — Outcome 99182766, $17,243 (72% win rate)
0x7ea5...de7b — Outcome 99182766, $16,098 (64% win rate)
0x160b...4296 — Outcome 99182766, $7,767 (75% win rate)
0x27f7...44b0 — Outcome 99182766, $5,527 (88% win rate)
0x22d6...00d5 — Outcome 99182766, $2,500
0x28af...3875 — Outcome 99182766, $2,500
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 92735909, $2,374
0x01c7...e995 — Outcome 99182766, $1,504 (64% win rate)
0xe6a9...f688 — Outcome 99182766, $1,156
0x2652...2a1d — Outcome 99182766, $419

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

Will Lille OSC vs. Racing Club de Lens end in a draw?

ResolvedLille OSC vs. Racing Club de Lens$27,377 tracked4 signalsSportsSoccerLigue 1Games

In the upcoming game, scheduled for April 4, 2026 If the game ends in a draw, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve to "Yes". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.