This bettor wins 87% of resolved trades and is up $1.26M lifetime. They are a serial cross-market trader across 297 events with the same 87% hit rate. Entry at 48¢ implies they see O'Higgins failing to win as underpriced.

Part of: O'Higgins FC vs. Everton de Viña del Mar

Will O'Higgins FC win on 2026-05-31?

5 smart money signals detected, totaling $16,140.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer

Notable Trades

Sharp cluster caught late No

Strong No cluster on a soccer market: three wallets bought before a rapid move to 100%, including an 87% winner up $1.26M and a new profitable repeat bettor.

A bettor who wins 87% of resolved trades and is up $1.26M bought No at 48¢.
Three wallets all bought No within the window, pushing the side up 25.5 points in 3 minutes.
One buyer is a 4-day-old repeat large bettor already up $9,794 across early positions.

$4,544 on No

Profitable new repeat bettor

A 4-day-old wallet with repeated large flagged bets and early $9.8k profit is buying No on a relatively quiet soccer market.

This 4-day-old bettor is already up $9.8k across early positions.
The wallet has been flagged 11 times for large bets, totaling $24.3k in recent activity.
This $1.46k No buy is a meaningful bet in a market with only $2.2k traded in the past day.

$1,460 on No | Wallet win rate: 100%

87% winner buying No

Elite sharp bettor with an 87% win rate and $1.26M lifetime profit bought No on a relatively quiet soccer market.

This bettor wins 87% of resolved trades and is up $1.26M lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 297 events with the same 87% hit rate.
Entry at 48¢ implies they see O'Higgins failing to win as underpriced.

$1,742 on No | Wallet win rate: 56%

89% winner buying Yes

Sharp-wallet override: a highly profitable 89% lifetime winner is making a $4.4k O'Higgins Yes bet on a relatively quiet soccer market.

This bettor wins 89% of resolved trades and is up $1.54M lifetime.
They put $4.4k on Yes at 52¢ in a market with only about $2.2k 24h volume.
Entry at 52¢ implies they see O'Higgins as better than an even-money chance.

$4,391 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 90%

Quiet-market $4k soccer bet

A single wallet put $4k on Yes in an extremely inactive, illiquid soccer market, making the size notable despite no proven wallet track record.

A bettor placed $4k on a market with $0 traded in the last 24 hours.
The bet is nearly 9x the listed liquidity, suggesting strong conviction in a very thin market.
Entry at 49¢ implies they see O'Higgins as roughly a coin flip to win.

$4,002 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 22%

Top Holders

0xf5f9...87b0 — Outcome 96915247, $19,053 (90% win rate)
0x8893...be06 — Outcome 96915247, $8,167 (22% win rate)
0x8fe7...4f20 — Outcome 96915247, $1,500 (67% win rate)
0x397e...3d84 — Outcome 96915247, $1,178 (77% win rate)
0x85d8...3cbe — Outcome 96915247, $193
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 10302469, $191
0x32de...6253 — Outcome 96915247, $144
0xa299...ac77 — Outcome 96915247, $100
0x5f56...348a — Outcome 96915247, $71 (47% win rate)
0x3d7d...10fc — Outcome 96915247, $70 (51% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 3 related markets

Czechia won't beat Korea

Covers 3 related markets

Canada-Bosnia match canceled

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 1 related market

Will O'Higgins FC win on 2026-05-31?

ResolvedO'Higgins FC vs. Everton de Viña del Mar$16,140 tracked5 signalsSportsGamesSoccer

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 31, 2026 If O'Higgins FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.