Will Saudi Arabia win on 2026-06-26?

27 smart money signals detected, totaling $1,356,380.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, FIFA World Cup

Notable Trades

Profitable serial cross-market bettor

Profitable high-volume bettor with a long cross-market history bought Saudi Arabia Yes during a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor has 3,294 resolved bets, wins 60% of them, and is up $258K lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 162 events, suggesting a repeatable sports-betting process.
Market activity spiked nearly 999x above its historical average before the match.

$5,622 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 59%

79% winner funded cluster

Sharp, profitable serial cross-market trader with a 79% record is buying No, supported by a 4-wallet funded cluster signal.

This bettor wins 79% of resolved trades and is up $21,316 lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 49 events with $101,900 tracked volume.
The wallet is part of a 4-wallet funded cluster, adding weight to the No position.

$3,600 on No | Wallet win rate: 80%

New whale joins Yes cluster

A 3-day-old repeat whale bought $12.7k of Yes as part of a same-direction cluster and a major pre-event volume spike.

A 3-day-old wallet bought $12.7k of Yes and has now been flagged for $44k in large bets.
Three wallets are all buying the same side, totaling $22k on Yes.
Market volume is surging 35x above its usual pace before the match.

$12,744 on Yes

Sharp whale joins No cluster

Highly profitable 88% win-rate wallet bought $58k of No, alongside six-wallet one-sided flow totaling $195k.

This bettor wins 88% of resolved trades and is up $1.28M lifetime.
They bought $58k of No, adding to a 6-wallet same-direction move worth $195k.
This wallet is a serial cross-market trader across 42 events with the same 88% hit rate.

$58,364 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%

New profitable whale joins NO cluster

A very new but already profitable wallet made an $81.8k No bet alongside a 6-wallet one-sided cluster and a large pre-event volume spike.

A 4-day-old wallet put $81.8k on No and is already up $22.7k across 6 positions.
Six wallets are all buying No, totaling $194.6k in one-sided flow.
Market volume spiked 43x ahead of the match while the entry sits around 65¢.

$81,750 on No | Wallet win rate: 89%

85% winner buying Yes

Sharp sports bettor with an 85% record and positive lifetime P&L bought Saudi Arabia Yes at 37¢ despite the market drifting lower.

This bettor has won 17 of 20 resolved bets and is up $3.3k lifetime.
They beat their average entry odds by 24 percentage points, suggesting real betting edge.
Bought Yes at 37¢ on a highly liquid sports market; current odds are slightly cheaper around 34¢.

$4,329 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 85%

1-day wallet up $59K

A 1-day-old repeat bettor with $99K in flagged bets and $59.7K early profit is buying Saudi Arabia Yes at 37¢.

This new bettor is already up $59.7K after placing many large bets in its first day.
The wallet has won 6 of 8 resolved bets so far and has $99K total flagged across 51 alerts.
Entry at 37¢ implies a roughly 2.7x payout if Saudi Arabia wins in regulation.

$1,500 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 69%

Four-wallet NO cluster

Surfacing for coordinated one-sided flow: four wallets put $82.8K on No during a 46.6x pre-event volume spike, though this specific wallet has only a modest track record.

Four wallets are betting the same way, with $82.8K concentrated on No.
Volume spiked 46.6x versus the market’s usual pace before the match.
This trade effectively buys No at 60¢, below the current 62¢ market price.

$1,852 on No | Wallet win rate: 45%

97% winner backing Yes

Elite 97% winning wallet bought Saudi Arabia Yes amid heavy one-sided flow and a major pre-event volume spike.

This bettor wins 97% of resolved trades and is up $158,667 lifetime.
Eight wallets are all buying the same side, totaling $155,614 on Yes.
Market volume spiked 92.6x before the game, suggesting a strong wave of positioning.

$5,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 96%

Profitable serial trader joins No cluster

A profitable high-volume sports trader bought No alongside a 7-wallet, $92k one-sided cluster during a major pre-game volume spike.

This bettor has a long record: 2,531 resolved bets, 69% wins, and $119k profit.
Seven wallets are all buying No, totaling $92k in the same direction.
Market volume spiked 81x versus normal, with No still available near the trader’s 62¢ entry.

$4,100 on No | Wallet win rate: 70%

Top Holders

0xb7ae...337c — Outcome 13230917, $300,000
0x50f0...5355 — Outcome 13230917, $252,248 (100% win rate)
0x7c1e...bab3 — Outcome 13230917, $200,000 (97% win rate)
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 22409679, $112,038
0xc1da...fefa — Outcome 13230917, $100,000 (89% win rate)
0x6d77...bcaf — Outcome 13230917, $100,000 (100% win rate)
0x8fbb...9a17 — Outcome 13230917, $66,666 (53% win rate)
0x5848...a698 — Outcome 13230917, $54,000 (100% win rate)
0x23d8...0288 — Outcome 13230917, $52,991 (86% win rate)
0xc3c3...eec8 — Outcome 13230917, $50,000 (99% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Brazil-Haiti finishes with three or five-plus

Covers 3 related markets

Knicks win a high-scoring game

Covers 8 related markets

Thunder win high-scoring shootout

Covers 8 related markets

Will Saudi Arabia win on 2026-06-26?

ResolvedCabo Verde vs. Saudi Arabia$1,356,380 tracked27 signalsSportsGamesSoccerFIFA World Cup

In the upcoming game, scheduled for June 26, 2026 If Saudi Arabia wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Price History — “No”