Four wallets all bought the same side, putting $241,788 on Sunderland Yes. Market volume spiked 585x above normal, suggesting a sudden wave of conviction. This entry at 48¢ implies roughly a 2.1x payout if Sunderland wins.

Part of: Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Sunderland AFC

Will Sunderland AFC win on 2026-05-02?

10 smart money signals detected, totaling $389,339.

Categories: Sports, Games, Soccer, Premier League, EPL

Notable Trades

96% win-rate bettor fades favorite

A highly profitable bettor with a 96% resolved-market record bought Sunderland No at 50¢ despite the market trending toward Yes.

This bettor wins 96% of resolved trades and is up $181,850 lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader across 92 events with the same 96% hit rate.
Entry at 50¢ on No goes against recent Yes momentum, suggesting a sharp contrarian view.

$3,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 47%

Profitable bettors pile into No

High-conviction No cluster: 8 wallets bought $67k near kickoff amid a massive volume spike, including several highly profitable sports wallets, though there is notable opposing Yes flow.

8 wallets bought $67k of No around 51¢ right before kickoff.
Several buyers have strong records, including wallets up $2.6M and $1.7M lifetime.
Market volume spiked 585x, showing a major rush of pre-game positioning.

$67,192 on No

New whale pregame Yes surge

A new repeat whale put $230k on Sunderland Yes minutes before kickoff amid a 4-wallet one-sided surge and massive volume spike.

A new 9-day-old wallet made a $230k bet on Yes minutes before the match window closed.
Four wallets all bought the same side, totaling about $242k on Sunderland to win.
Volume spiked 585x above normal, suggesting a sudden rush of pregame conviction.

$230,492 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 92%

4-wallet Yes surge

High-conviction one-sided flow: 4 wallets bought $241.8k of Sunderland Yes during a 585x volume spike minutes before the key match window.

Four wallets all bought the same side, putting $241,788 on Sunderland Yes.
Market volume spiked 585x above normal, suggesting a sudden wave of conviction.
This entry at 48¢ implies roughly a 2.1x payout if Sunderland wins.

$2,500 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 24%

New profitable whale buying Yes

A very new wallet with repeated large-bet flags and early profit bought $62.4k of Sunderland Yes into a major pre-event volume spike.

This 9-day-old wallet has already been flagged 150 times with $4.1M in large bets.
The bettor is up $892k on resolved positions so far, though the track record is still short.
They bought $62.4k of Yes at 48¢ as market volume spiked 684x above normal.

$62,400 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 92%

96% winner buying NO

A highly profitable 96% sports bettor with serial cross-market success and a 6-wallet funded cluster is making a large BUY No position.

This bettor has won 25 of 26 resolved bets and is up about $263K lifetime.
They are a serial sports trader across 44 events with a 96% hit rate.
Six wallets sharing the same funder are tied to this flow, adding about $14.8K in aligned activity.

$11,825 on No | Wallet win rate: 95%

Profitable 76% sports bettor

A proven profitable sports bettor with 363 resolved bets is buying Sunderland No at 52¢, though the position size is modest in a liquid market.

This bettor wins 76% of resolved bets and is up $123K lifetime.
Their historical results beat market odds by about 21 percentage points across 363 bets.
Buying No at 52¢ implies they think Sunderland is more likely to fail to win than the market suggests.

$1,155 on No | Wallet win rate: 79%

84% serial cross-market bettor

Serial cross-market bettor with an 84% resolved win rate bought $6.5k of No, though the market is liquid and the edge signal is moderate.

This bettor wins 84% of resolved trades across more than 1,000 markets.
They are a serial cross-market trader with $3.7M tracked across 76 events.
Entry at 53¢ on No is slightly above current market odds, signaling conviction against Sunderland winning.

$6,506 on No | Wallet win rate: 85%

Perfect 19-0 sports bettor

Despite a low alert score and modest size, this is a fresh No bet from a wallet with a perfect 19-0 resolved record and strong profit history.

This bettor has won 19 of 19 resolved bets and is up about $12K.
Their average winning entry was 41¢, so the track record is not just from heavy favorites.
They are buying No at 55¢ on a liquid soccer market with a tight 1¢ spread.

$1,268 on No | Wallet win rate: 97%

New whale with $449K profit

High-severity repeat new-wallet signal from a profitable sports bettor with $449K P&L and an 83% resolved win record buying Sunderland Yes at 45¢.

This repeat bettor is up $449K on $982K invested across prior positions.
They have won 5 of 6 resolved bets, with average winning entries around 46¢.
A fresh 45¢ entry implies they see Sunderland as undervalued versus the market’s 44¢ odds.

$3,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 97%

Top Holders

0x0eb5...c494 — Outcome 83460381, $754,633 (92% win rate)
0xbd14...d62a — Outcome 83460381, $6,712 (97% win rate)
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 10845195, $3,123
0x4a8d...31ea — Outcome 83460381, $2,722 (98% win rate)
0x26a6...dede — Outcome 83460381, $1,981 (50% win rate)
0xb9b4...3111 — Outcome 83460381, $1,041
0x19e9...239b — Outcome 83460381, $612
0xa96f...0cd0 — Outcome 83460381, $612
0xa0dd...3c69 — Outcome 83460381, $555
0x9ab2...a2b7 — Outcome 83460381, $525

Related Theses

Covers 1 related market

Will Sunderland AFC win on 2026-05-02?

ResolvedWolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Sunderland AFC$389,339 tracked10 signalsSportsGamesSoccerPremier LeagueEPL

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 2, 2026 If Sunderland AFC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.