Part of: Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

This prediction market tracks whether California voters will approve a proposition imposing a one-time tax on individuals, households, or family units with at least $1 billion in wealth or net worth. It resolves on November 3, 2026, based on the outcome of California’s general election; PolySpotter also tracks smart-money activity and recent Yes/No trading signals.

A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

19 smart money signals detected, totaling $129,386.

Categories: Taxes, referendum, referendums midterms, Fiscal, Politics, Elections

Notable Trades

Proven bettor buying No

A consistently profitable bettor with 365 resolved trades is buying No, supported by a substantial track record and extensive cross-market activity.

  • This bettor has won 81% of 365 resolved trades and earned about $2.43M in profit.
  • They are putting $4,069 on No at 72¢ in a liquid market.
  • The wallet has traded across 107 events, suggesting a repeatable cross-market approach.

$4,069 on No | Wallet win rate: 81%

Proven bettor adding to No

A profitable bettor with a 79% win rate across 291 resolved bets is adding to an existing No position at 74¢.

  • This bettor has won 79% of 291 resolved bets and is up about $138,000.
  • They added $5,627 to an existing No position at 74¢, showing continued conviction.

$1,554 on No | Wallet win rate: 79%

Proven bettor adding to No

A profitable bettor with a 79% win rate across 291 resolved bets is adding to an existing No position at 74¢.

  • This bettor has won 79% of 291 resolved bets and is up about $138,000.
  • They added $5,627 to an existing No position at 74¢, showing continued conviction.

$5,627 on No | Wallet win rate: 79%

Serial cross-market bettor adds to No

A sizable $29,191 No buy adds to an existing position amid a 119x volume spike, though the wallet's track record does not show clear odds-adjusted edge.

  • A $29,191 No buy adds to a position already worth $43,500.
  • Trading volume spiked to 119 times its historical average, an unusual burst of activity.
  • The wallet has traded across 81 events, but its 69% win rate is not strong relative to its average winning entry price.

$29,191 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%

Three-wallet coordinated Yes flow

Three wallets sold about $15,000 of No around the same time, creating equivalent Yes exposure alongside a 119x volume spike, though the trades may partly reflect exits from existing No positions.

  • Three wallets sold No for about $15,000 total, equivalent to buying Yes around 28–29¢.
  • Trading volume was 119 times its historical average, and Yes odds have risen about 5% over the past day.
  • Several traders already held No positions, so some of this flow may be position-closing rather than fresh conviction.

$14,964 on Yes

Proven bettor adding to No

A highly profitable bettor with an 81% win rate is adding a substantial $18,725 No position to an already large holding.

  • This bettor has won 81% of 231 resolved markets and is up $4.6M lifetime.
  • They added $18,725 to an existing No position averaging 63¢, with No currently around 70¢.
  • The market’s thin 24-hour volume makes this bet a substantial share of recent trading.

$18,725 on No | Wallet win rate: 79%

Linked wallets back Yes

A large equivalent Yes position from a serial cross-market trader, alongside a linked wallet, is notable despite limited evidence of exceptional trading skill.

  • The trader committed $14,333 to the Yes side, equivalent to buying Yes at 30¢.
  • Two wallets sharing a funder are positioned in the same direction, creating a coordinated $14,333 signal in a relatively quiet market.
  • This wallet has traded across 218 markets and 157 events, with a 61% win rate over 1,666 resolved bets.

$14,333 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 62%

Sharp bettor flips to No

A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.

  • This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
  • They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
  • The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.

$2,697 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%

Sharp bettor flips to No

A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.

  • This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
  • They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
  • The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.

$1,679 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%

Profitable serial policy bettor

Sharp, highly profitable serial cross-market trader is effectively buying Yes at 22¢ on a California 2026 wealth-tax market.

  • This bettor wins 79% of resolved trades and is up $3.84M lifetime.
  • They have traded 237 markets across 147 events, suggesting a repeatable cross-market edge.
  • Selling No at 78¢ is equivalent to buying Yes at 22¢, below the current 24¢ market price.

$2,594 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 79%

Top Holders

  1. 0x0405...da82 — Yes, $374,097
  2. 0xee0f...4cf5 — Yes, $365,599
  3. 0xdd22...9ef1 — No, $178,370 (54% win rate)
  4. 0xde7b...5f4b — No, $133,581 (79% win rate)
  5. 0x811b...7006 — Yes, $101,869
  6. 0x0042...321e — No, $56,878 (52% win rate)
  7. 0x7c87...9bd4 — No, $43,073 (76% win rate)
  8. 0xb51b...b4d9 — No, $41,751 (61% win rate)
  9. 0x095d...52cf — No, $38,727
  10. 0x6575...b198 — Yes, $35,665 (75% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 7 related markets

Covers 5 related markets

Iran closes airspace mid-May

Covers 4 related markets

Fujimori or Sánchez wins presidency

Covers 2 related markets

Iran ceasefire collapses by June

Covers 6 related markets

Neither Chong nor Oh wins

Covers 2 related markets

Someone else wins Peru presidency

Covers 3 related markets

US-Iran peace deal coming

Covers 9 related markets

Netanyahu remains in office

Covers 2 related markets

Lula or Flávio wins Brazil’s presidency

Covers 2 related markets

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?$129,386 tracked19 signalsTaxesreferendumreferendums midtermsFiscalPoliticsElections
Yes
25¢
No
76¢

A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Price History — “No”
81¢
75¢
70¢
Alert entriesHigh-conviction

Notable Trades

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-11-02 05:41 UTC

$4,069 on No at 72¢

72¢→76¢↑4¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-11-01 20:53 UTC

$1,554 on No at 74¢

74¢→76¢↑2¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-11-01 20:42 UTC

$5,627 on No at 74¢

74¢→76¢↑2¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-10-29 18:50 UTC

$29,191 on No at 73¢

73¢→76¢↑3¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-10-29 18:10 UTC

$14,964 on Yes at 29¢

29¢→25¢↓4¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-10-05 15:34 UTC

$18,725 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-09-16 04:40 UTC

$14,333 on Yes at 30¢

30¢→25¢↓5¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-08-15 16:13 UTC

$2,697 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-08-15 04:09 UTC

$1,679 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-08-14 18:23 UTC

$2,594 on Yes at 22¢

22¢→25¢↑3¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-07-15 15:34 UTC

$1,400 on No at 68¢

68¢→76¢↑8¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-07-10 00:34 UTC

$3,448 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-26 01:18 UTC

$4,000 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-25 00:15 UTC

$12,607 on Yes at 22¢

22¢→25¢↑3¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-22 18:29 UTC

$1,222 on No at 78¢

78¢→76¢↓2¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-14 18:57 UTC

$2,000 on No at 70¢

70¢→76¢↑6¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-12 00:55 UTC

$3,300 on No at 66¢

66¢→76¢↑10¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-06-11 21:05 UTC

$4,478 on No at 62¢

62¢→76¢↑14¢

Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?

2026-05-28 04:20 UTC

$1,500 on Yes at 39¢

39¢→25¢↓14¢

Related Theses