Part of: Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
This prediction market tracks whether California voters will approve a proposition creating a one-time tax on individuals, households, or family units with at least $1 billion in wealth, assets, or net worth. The market resolves on November 3, 2026, based on the outcome of California’s general election; live odds and smart-money activity are available on PolySpotter.
A one-time wealth tax on billionaires has been proposed to potentially appear on California's ballot for the November 3, 2026 general election. You can read more about that here: https://6abc.com/post/california-union-proposes-taxing-billionaires-offset-medicaid-cuts-low-income-people/18066430/ This market will resolve to "Yes" if any proposition containing a one-time tax targeting individuals, households, or family units with wealth, assets, or net worth of at least $1 billion (USD or equivalent) passes in the named election. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If no qualifying ballot initiative is certified to appear on the official statewide California ballot as a proposition to be voted on in the stated election by June 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (the official cutoff date for new initiatives to be approved), or if all qualifying propositions/initiatives are removed from the ballot or amended before the election such that the main threshold drops below $1 billion, this market will resolve "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Government of the State of California, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
12 smart money signals detected, totaling $40,924.
Categories: Politics, Elections, Taxes, referendum, referendums midterms, Fiscal
Notable Trades
Sharp bettor flips to No
A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
- They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
- The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.
$2,697 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Sharp bettor flips to No
A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
- They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
- The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.
$1,679 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Profitable serial policy bettor
Sharp, highly profitable serial cross-market trader is effectively buying Yes at 22¢ on a California 2026 wealth-tax market.
- This bettor wins 79% of resolved trades and is up $3.84M lifetime.
- They have traded 237 markets across 147 events, suggesting a repeatable cross-market edge.
- Selling No at 78¢ is equivalent to buying Yes at 22¢, below the current 24¢ market price.
$2,594 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 80%
82% serial cross-market winner
Proven cross-market trader with an 82% resolved win rate is taking a No position on a political ballot market, though the bet size is modest relative to liquidity.
- This bettor wins 82% of resolved trades and is up $29.6k lifetime.
- They have traded across 25 events and 28 markets, suggesting a repeatable research edge.
- The new position backs No at 68¢, against a market currently pricing Yes around 33%.
$1,400 on No | Wallet win rate: 83%
Sharp bettor flips to No
A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
- They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
- The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.
$3,448 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Sharp bettor flips to No
A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
- They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
- The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.
$4,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Profitable serial policy bettor
Sharp, highly profitable serial cross-market trader is effectively buying Yes at 22¢ on a California 2026 wealth-tax market.
- This bettor wins 79% of resolved trades and is up $3.84M lifetime.
- They have traded 237 markets across 147 events, suggesting a repeatable cross-market edge.
- Selling No at 78¢ is equivalent to buying Yes at 22¢, below the current 24¢ market price.
$12,607 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 80%
Profitable funded cluster buys NO
A profitable near-sharp wallet in a recurring funded cluster is buying No on a quiet long-dated California tax market.
- This wallet is 9-for-9 on resolved bets and is up about $150K lifetime.
- Three wallets sharing the same funder have been repeatedly flagged betting this market direction.
- The bet is on No at 78¢, matching the current market favorite despite light 24h volume.
$1,222 on No | Wallet win rate: 89%
Sharp bettor flips to No
A highly profitable 81% win-rate wallet flipped from a closed Yes position into No, making this worth surfacing despite modest trade size.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up about $723k lifetime.
- They closed a prior Yes position and are now buying No, suggesting a real change in view.
- The $2k buy was large versus recent quiet trading and entered at 70¢ on No.
$2,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Sharp bettor flips to No
Sharp wallet with an 81% record across 1,265 resolved positions and $721k profit is buying No on a liquid California politics market.
- This bettor wins 81% of resolved trades and is up $721k lifetime.
- They bought $3.3k of No after previously closing a Yes position, suggesting a thesis change.
- Entry at 66¢ implies they see No as meaningfully underpriced despite the market currently around 64¢.
$3,300 on No | Wallet win rate: 82%
Top Holders
- 0x0405...da82 — Yes, $374,097
- 0xee0f...4cf5 — Yes, $365,599
- 0x7744...999e — No, $236,161 (43% win rate)
- 0xde7b...5f4b — No, $113,861 (80% win rate)
- 0x811b...7006 — Yes, $101,869
- 0x0042...321e — No, $56,878 (52% win rate)
- 0x7c87...9bd4 — No, $43,073 (76% win rate)
- 0x095d...52cf — No, $38,727
- 0xdabe...bd89 — Yes, $30,346
- 0x41ea...7a3d — Yes, $26,755 (47% win rate)
Related Theses
US-Iran peace deal coming
Covers 9 related markets
Someone else wins Peru presidency
Covers 3 related markets
Iran ceasefire collapses by June
Covers 6 related markets
Netanyahu will leave office by 2026
Covers 2 related markets
Iran closes airspace mid-May
Covers 4 related markets
Iran deal announced by May
Covers 7 related markets
US-Iran meeting on April 21
Covers 10 related markets
Porter, Steyer or Becerra wins
Covers 3 related markets
