Part of: Counter-Strike: Sinners vs Astralis (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B

Counter-Strike: Sinners vs Astralis - Map 2 Winner

5 smart money signals detected, totaling $17,577.

Categories: Esports, counter strike 2, Games, Sports

Notable Trades

Profitable esports mover

A high-volume profitable esports bettor bought Astralis at 52¢ before the market moved sharply to 94¢, with cross-market positioning across the same event.

This bettor is up $347k across more than 7,600 resolved bets despite only winning 51% of them.
They bought Astralis at 52¢, and the market has since moved to 94¢.
They have $10.5k positioned across 3 markets in the same event, suggesting a broader match thesis.

$1,053 on Astralis | Wallet win rate: 51%

Sharp cluster buying underdog

A 3-wallet Sinners cluster includes a profitable 76% bettor and a serial cross-market trader, though the market has moved sharply against their entries.

A bettor who wins 76% of resolved bets is backing Sinners and is up $61K lifetime.
Three wallets bought the same side for $4.6K, with entries between 43¢ and 58¢.
This group has a broad event-trading history, including 33 prior events and $173K in cross-market volume.

$4,554 on Sinners

Profitable serial cross-market bettor

Sharp serial cross-market esports bettor with a 76% win rate and $61k profit bought Sinners at 52¢.

This bettor wins 76% of resolved trades and is up $61k lifetime.
They have traded across 32 events and 35 markets, suggesting a repeatable cross-market edge.
Entry at 52¢ implies they see Sinners as better than a coin flip despite an even market.

$2,349 on Sinners | Wallet win rate: 86%

Sharp trio backing Astralis

Three wallets bought Astralis together, including one 11-0 bettor and another high-volume winning account, making this coordinated esports flow worth surfacing.

Three wallets put $6.5K on Astralis within 10 minutes.
One bettor is 11-0 on resolved trades and up $3.6K lifetime.
Another has 1,743 resolved bets with an 83% win record.

$6,472 on Astralis

Profitable serial cross-market bettor

A highly profitable serial cross-market bettor with $662k lifetime profit bought $3.1k of Astralis on a relatively quiet Map 2 market.

This bettor is up $662k lifetime across 608 resolved trades.
They have traded 325 markets across 210 events, suggesting a repeatable sports/esports process.
The $3.1k Astralis buy is large versus this market’s $8.4k daily volume.

$3,150 on Astralis | Wallet win rate: 79%

Top Holders

0x5bbe...c65d — Outcome 24753036, $29,050
0x93f6...4814 — Outcome 24753036, $8,766 (39% win rate)
0x8f69...7df1 — Outcome 24753036, $5,000 (69% win rate)
0x54c2...23ad — Outcome 24753036, $4,547 (86% win rate)
0xf3ef...ca6b — Outcome 24753036, $2,848 (61% win rate)
0x880b...c98b — Outcome 24753036, $1,805 (70% win rate)
0xc2e5...b3a5 — Outcome 24753036, $1,217 (68% win rate)
0xe872...819a — Outcome 24753036, $1,094 (78% win rate)
0x8935...7daa — Outcome 24753036, $658
0xf348...e543 — Outcome 24753036, $540 (63% win rate)

Related Theses

Counter-Strike: Sinners vs Astralis - Map 2 Winner

ResolvedCounter-Strike: Sinners vs Astralis (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group B$17,577 tracked5 signalsEsportscounter strike 2GamesSports

This market refers to the Counter-Strike Lower bracket semifinal 1 match between Sinners and Astralis in the IEM Atlanta Group B, initially scheduled for May 13 at 2:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Sinners" if Sinners win Map 2 against Astralis. This market will resolve to "Astralis" if Astralis win Map 2 against Sinners. If the match begins but is not completed, and Map 2 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Map 2. If Map 2 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.