This bettor has won 70% of 243 resolved bets and is up about $22.8k lifetime. They are a serial cross-market trader, active across 47 events with $238k+ previously deployed. Buying No at 88¢ shows confidence that Algeria does not win in regulation.

This brand-new wallet has already made six large flagged bets totaling $154k. The bettor is 5-for-5 on resolved markets so far, though the track record is still very short. Buying No at 89¢ suggests a high-conviction favorite position with limited upside but strong implied confidence.

Part of: Argentina vs. Algeria

Will Algeria win on 2026-06-16?

8 smart money signals detected, totaling $47,313.

Categories: Sports, FIFA World Cup, Games, Soccer

Notable Trades

Repeat new wallet on underdog

A 12-day-old repeat large bettor with early profit is buying the 14¢ Algeria underdog amid a notable pre-event volume spike.

This 12-day-old wallet has now triggered 5 large-bet alerts totaling $17,075.
The wallet is already up $725 despite only 3 resolved markets, suggesting early conviction rather than random activity.
Market activity is heating up with a 17.3x volume spike, and this buy takes Algeria at 14¢.

$1,190 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 75%

Serial sports bettor

Serial cross-market sports bettor with a 70% resolved-bet record and positive lifetime P&L is backing No with a modest but copyable position.

This bettor has won 70% of 243 resolved bets and is up about $22.8k lifetime.
They are a serial cross-market trader, active across 47 events with $238k+ previously deployed.
Buying No at 88¢ shows confidence that Algeria does not win in regulation.

$2,500 on No | Wallet win rate: 72%

Six-wallet long-shot cluster

A high-scoring six-wallet cluster bought Algeria Yes against the market, backed by a huge pre-event volume spike, cross-market positioning, and at least one profitable sharp wallet.

Six wallets put $29K on the same long-shot side, with several entries around 12–17¢ while the market now sits near 4¢.
One participating bettor wins 76% of resolved bets and is up $188K lifetime.
The market saw a 210x volume spike plus related bets across 3 markets in the same event.

$29,083 on Yes

Brand-new repeat bettor

A 5-hour-old wallet making its third flagged large bet bought $4.5k of No, alongside a major pre-event volume spike.

This wallet is only 5 hours old but has already made 3 flagged bets totaling about $21k.
The market is seeing a 112x volume spike, suggesting broader pre-game money is arriving in the same window.
Entry at 88¢ is a high-confidence bet that Algeria does not win in regulation.

$4,500 on No | Wallet win rate: 97%

One-day repeat whale

A 1-day-old wallet has repeatedly placed large bets, including this $5k BUY No, with $154k total flagged and a 5-for-5 resolved record so far.

This brand-new wallet has already made six large flagged bets totaling $154k.
The bettor is 5-for-5 on resolved markets so far, though the track record is still very short.
Buying No at 89¢ suggests a high-conviction favorite position with limited upside but strong implied confidence.

$5,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 98%

Perfect-record sports bettor

Sharp sports bettor with a perfect 33-0 resolved record and positive lifetime P&L bought Algeria No at 89¢.

This bettor has won 33 of 33 resolved trades and is up $13.4k lifetime.
Their past wins came at average 65¢ odds, so the perfect record is not just from buying near-certain outcomes.
Buying No at 89¢ implies they see Algeria failing to win as very likely.

$1,113 on No | Wallet win rate: 100%

4-wallet funded cluster

A high-severity funded-wallet cluster is backing Algeria not to win, with the participating wallet showing large lifetime profitability despite a modest win rate.

Four wallets funded by the same source have placed about $98K in related bets.
This wallet is up $1.36M lifetime across a very large betting history.
Buying No at 90¢ is a high-confidence position against Algeria winning.

$2,923 on No | Wallet win rate: 54%

4-wallet funded cluster

A high-severity funded-wallet cluster is backing Algeria not to win, with the participating wallet showing large lifetime profitability despite a modest win rate.

Four wallets funded by the same source have placed about $98K in related bets.
This wallet is up $1.36M lifetime across a very large betting history.
Buying No at 90¢ is a high-confidence position against Algeria winning.

$1,004 on No | Wallet win rate: 54%

Top Holders

0xfe78...0319 — Outcome 83723975, $310,969 (63% win rate)
0xa5ef...2966 — Outcome 83554771, $138,295
0x2a69...d2f7 — Outcome 83723975, $93,806 (70% win rate)
0x7a88...41cc — Outcome 83723975, $40,000 (63% win rate)
0xb2a6...7708 — Outcome 83723975, $33,942 (57% win rate)
0x5a66...dcc2 — Outcome 83723975, $29,617 (76% win rate)
0x8b9a...5f69 — Outcome 83723975, $19,797
0x18d8...6b26 — Outcome 83723975, $17,319 (75% win rate)
0x8b1d...1a19 — Outcome 83723975, $14,329 (75% win rate)
0x4f29...7a7e — Outcome 83723975, $13,542 (56% win rate)

Related Theses

Covers 8 related markets

No Iran peace deal

Covers 6 related markets

Germany advances in goal-filled match

Covers 3 related markets

England advances in high-scoring match

Covers 4 related markets

Covers 3 related markets

Covers 17 related markets

Covers 5 related markets

Will Algeria win on 2026-06-16?

ResolvedArgentina vs. Algeria$47,313 tracked8 signalsSportsFIFA World CupGamesSoccer

In the upcoming game, scheduled for June 16, 2026 If Algeria wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.