Part of: Ohio enacts data center moratorium by...?
Will Ohio enact a data center moratorium by June 30, 2027?
This Polymarket market asks whether Ohio will enact a legally binding statewide moratorium on new data centers by June 30, 2027, at 11:59 p.m. ET. The supplied metadata does not include current odds; it reports $5,000 in tracked smart money and one recent signal, a No position add.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the State of Ohio enacts a law or constitutional provision that establishes a statewide moratorium on new data centers between market creation and the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A statewide moratorium on new data centers refers to a binding policy with legal force that generally prohibits or suspends the approval, permitting, construction, grid interconnection, or operation of all new data centers, or a subset of data centers that includes all new data centers with an interconnection capacity above 100 MW per facility (requested or nameplate), throughout the state. Suspensions of tax incentives, exemption certifications, or economic development awards alone will not qualify, nor will a moratorium adopted by a local government or limited to part of the state. Specific exemptions (e.g., for specified applications, executed agreements, or interconnection requests) do not prevent a measure from generally applying to all new data centers, or a qualifying subset of new data centers, provided that data center approval, permitting, construction, grid interconnection, or operation is prohibited by default, rather than permitted subject to conditions or restrictions. Conditions on the resumption or termination of a suspension do not make a measure one that permits subject to conditions; a measure that suspends approvals, permitting, construction, or interconnection until a specified condition is satisfied qualifies. Enactment occurs when a bill becomes law under the state's constitution and laws, whether by gubernatorial signature, veto override, becoming law without signature, approval at a statewide referendum election, or any other legal mechanism by which statutes can be enacted. For an initiated or referred statute or constitutional amendment, or other voter referendum, the relevant law is considered to have been enacted on the election day on which it was approved, as reflected in the certified results, regardless of when the measure is certified or takes effect. Passage by one or both chambers, or a Governor's announced intent to sign, is not enactment. Executive orders, agency orders, and other measures which are not statutory or constitutional do not qualify as enactment regardless of legal force. A provision removed by line-item veto is not enacted unless the veto is overridden as to that item. The operative text of the measure at enactment controls; provisions amended out before enactment do not qualify. The moratorium provision must be mandatory on its face. A statute that merely authorizes a state agency or the Governor to impose a moratorium at their discretion does not qualify. A statute that directs suspension of approvals or interconnection upon a specified condition qualifies only if the condition is objectively determinable and is not deferred to be determined by the implementing agency's findings, certifications, or completion of its own proceedings. This market resolves based on the date of enactment, not the effective date. Resolution will not be affected by failure to implement a law, judicial invalidation, repeal, or expiry that follows a relevant enactment, or an effective date that comes after the date of enactment. The primary resolution source will be official information from the state government of Ohio; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
1 smart money signal detected, totaling $5,000.
Categories: AI, Tech, ohio, Compute, Congress, Politics, AI Regulation, Earn 4%
Notable Trades
Quiet-market No position add
A $5,000 addition to an existing No position is unusually large relative to the market's low daily volume, though the wallet has no clear exceptional track record.
- The bettor added $5,000 to an existing No position in a market with just $404 in 24-hour volume.
- The wallet already had about $6,000 invested in No, showing continued conviction; the entry was near the current 84% odds.
- The wallet has a large resolved-bet history but a 49% win rate, so this is notable for its size and timing rather than proven accuracy.
$5,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 48%
Top Holders
- 0xd8d5...8935 — No, $2,783 (69% win rate)
- 0x9495...468f — Yes, $1,987
- 0x8c0b...f0fb — No, $1,000 (78% win rate)
- 0xc602...7fc1 — Yes, $540 (43% win rate)
- 0x30fb...7db4 — Yes, $400
- 0x4959...a6f5 — Yes, $384
- 0xe457...5ab3 — Yes, $314
- 0x4bf4...7021 — Yes, $187 (79% win rate)
- 0x9d4a...5887 — No, $176
- 0xad53...ef24 — Yes, $128
Related Theses
Iran talks won’t happen before 2027
Covers 8 related markets
Iranian blockade will persist
Covers 10 related markets
Iran deal lacks major concessions
Covers 6 related markets
Iran ceasefire lasts through November
Covers 7 related markets
Iran deal comes in June
Covers 7 related markets
Iran talks unlikely by June
Covers 8 related markets
Israel-Iran ceasefire holds through November
Covers 9 related markets
Troop withdrawal, no Iran concessions
Covers 4 related markets
Iran keeps airspace open
Covers 9 related markets
No Iran deal by June
Covers 4 related markets