Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 30?
This Polymarket asks whether Kharg Island will no longer be under Iranian control by June 30, 2026. It resolves Yes only if Iran loses primary governmental or military control and another state, occupying force, or internationally backed authority takes control; otherwise it resolves No. Current market interest centers on Iran geopolitical risk, Strait of Hormuz tensions, and the strict resolution criteria for a transfer of control.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Kharg Island is no longer under Iranian control by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". “No longer under the control of Iran” means that Iran no longer exercises primary governmental or military control over Kharg Island, and another state, occupying force, or internationally backed authority has established control over the island. Temporary raids, isolated landings, special operations, bombardment, sabotage, naval presence offshore, or temporary disruption of Iranian activity will not qualify on their own. An announcement, threat, or claim that Iran has lost control will not qualify without actual control being established. If control changes pursuant to a negotiated settlement, ceasefire term, surrender, or transfer agreement, this will qualify only once actual control has been established on the island. If control over Kharg Island is contested, unclear, disputed, or not sufficiently established by the resolution date, this will not qualify, and the market will resolve to “No”. The primary resolution source will be official statements from the relevant governments and militaries, along with a consensus of credible reporting.
13 smart money signals detected, totaling $45,300.
Categories: Khamenei, Iran Regime, Kharg Island, Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, Geopolitics, Strait of Hormuz, Politics
Notable Trades
Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 30?
LLM evaluation inconclusive — kept for manual review.
- LLM evaluation inconclusive
$8,600 | Wallet win rate: 50%
93% win-rate geopolitics bettor
A wallet with a 93% win rate and $285k profit is adding a high-confidence No position in a geopolitics market, making this a credible sharp-bettor signal despite only one alert type firing.
- This bettor wins 93% of their resolved trades and is up $285k overall
- They bought No at 85¢, a high-confidence position in a major geopolitics market
- The wallet was also flagged for betting related markets in the same event, suggesting a broader thesis
$1,925 on No | Wallet win rate: 93%
93% win-rate geopolitical bettor
A 93% win-rate bettor with strong realized profits is adding a sizable position on the likely side of a geopolitical market, making this worth tracking despite only a single signal.
- This bettor wins 93% of resolved trades and is up about $286k overall.
- They put $3.7k on No at 85¢, backing the high-probability side in a real-world geopolitical market.
- The alert also shows the wallet trading across 2 related markets with the same event thesis, which suggests deliberate positioning rather than a random punt.
$3,681 on No | Wallet win rate: 93%
87% winner, event thesis
A highly profitable wallet with an 87% win rate is expressing the same event thesis across 3 related markets, and this trade backs the heavily favored No side at 85¢.
- This bettor wins 87% of their trades and is up about $702k across 89 resolved markets
- They have put $46.5k across 3 related markets in the same event, which suggests a coordinated thesis rather than a one-off bet
- They bought No at 85¢ in a liquid market, backing the view that regime control remains unchanged by June 30
$1,948 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%
93% win-rate bettor
A proven sharp wallet with a 93% win rate is adding a sizeable No position in a geopolitically sensitive market during an 86.6x volume spike, making this flow worth following despite the market being fairly liquid.
- This bettor wins 93% of resolved trades and is up $283k across 55 settled bets
- They bought No at 86¢ while volume ran 86.6x above normal, suggesting informed positioning on this event
- The market still has solid liquidity, so this looks more like a sharp directional bet than a random thin-market punt
$2,550 on No | Wallet win rate: 93%
93% win-rate geopolitical bettor
A bettor with a 93% win rate and $283k profit made a large $9.1k buy on No, accounting for over half of 24h volume in a geopolitically relevant market during an unusual volume surge.
- This bettor wins 93% of resolved trades and is up $283k across 55 settled bets
- They bought $9.1k of No at 85¢, over 53% of this market's 24-hour volume
- The market saw an 85.8x volume spike, suggesting serious positioning in this event
$9,100 on No | Wallet win rate: 93%
88% winner, event thesis
A high-performing wallet with an 88% win rate is expressing the same thesis across three related markets, suggesting informed conviction even though this individual fill is modest.
- This bettor wins 88% of their trades and is up about $702k across 88 resolved markets
- They have put $30.8k across 3 related markets in this same event, showing a coordinated thesis rather than a one-off bet
- They bought No at 85¢ in a liquid market, backing the current favorite with a trader who has a strong track record
$1,601 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%
87% win-rate event bettor
A highly profitable wallet with an 87% win rate is expressing the same event thesis across three related markets, making this a credible follow signal despite the modest single-trade size.
- This bettor wins 87% of their resolved trades and is up about $604k lifetime.
- They have put $23k across 3 related markets in the same event, suggesting a deliberate thesis rather than a one-off bet.
- They bought No at 84¢ in a liquid market, reinforcing the view that regime control is still very likely by June 30.
$1,292 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%
89% win-rate geopolitics bettor
A proven sharp wallet with an 89% win rate bought Yes at 15¢ in a geopolitics market, suggesting they see the low-probability outcome as mispriced.
- This bettor wins 89% of their resolved trades and is up about $11.5k overall.
- They bought Yes at 15¢, a cheap price for a high-impact geopolitics market where information edge can matter.
- The market has solid volume and liquidity, so this looks more like a deliberate thesis bet than a random punt.
$1,156 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 90%
87% win-rate event bettor
A high-performing wallet with an 87% win rate is expressing the same geopolitical thesis across 3 related markets, adding credibility even though this specific trade is in a liquid market.
- This bettor wins 87% of their trades and is up $574k across 82 resolved markets
- They put $25.7k across 3 related markets in the same event, showing a coordinated thesis rather than a one-off bet
- They bought No at 90¢ in a liquid market, backing the view that this outcome remains very likely despite recent price drift
$3,828 on No | Wallet win rate: 87%
Top Holders
- 0x9648...6825 — No, $110,524 (70% win rate)
- 0x8afa...adb6 — No, $66,995 (93% win rate)
- 0xa9fe...f135 — Yes, $66,126 (62% win rate)
- 0x2974...9c23 — No, $43,296 (93% win rate)
- 0xc021...1fa8 — No, $42,014 (53% win rate)
- 0x1521...f23e — Yes, $39,369 (69% win rate)
- 0xe5f0...dc1d — Yes, $27,909 (20% win rate)
- 0x3ac4...0e8b — Yes, $25,000
- 0x7f9e...3a0e — No, $22,388 (87% win rate)
- 0xb886...81b3 — Yes, $21,112
