Part of: Will China invade Taiwan by December 31, 2027?
Will China invade Taiwan by December 31, 2027?
This prediction market asks whether China will begin a military offensive intended to control any inhabited territory administered by Taiwan by December 31, 2027. The supplied metadata does not include current Yes/No odds; PolySpotter tracks $17,101 in smart money activity across one signal for this market.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if China commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of the Republic of China (Taiwan) by December 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". Territory under the administration of the Republic of China, including any inhabited islands, will qualify; however, uninhabited islands will not qualify. The resolution source for this market will be official confirmation by China, Taiwan, the United Nations, or any permanent member of the UN Security Council; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
36 smart money signals detected, totaling $797,306.
Categories: China, Politics, World, Geopolitics
Notable Trades
Serial trader scaling into No
A serial cross-market trader added $2,022 to an existing No position amid a 171x volume spike and a sharp No price rise, creating a notable though not elite conviction signal.
- The market saw a 171x spike versus its historical trading volume, while No rose 27% as money entered.
- This trader added $2,022 to an existing No position worth $5,397, signaling increased conviction rather than routine profit-taking.
- The wallet has resolved 390 trades with a 66% win rate and has traded across 69 markets.
$17,101 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Proven 80% winner
Sharp-wallet override: a bettor with an 80% resolved win rate and positive lifetime P&L bought No on a major geopolitical market.
- This bettor wins 80% of resolved trades and is up $2.2k lifetime.
- Their past wins came at average 57¢ odds, suggesting they have beaten market expectations.
- They bought No at 85¢, backing the view that China does not invade Taiwan by end-2027.
$3,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 84%
Serial trader scaling into No
A serial cross-market trader added $2,022 to an existing No position amid a 171x volume spike and a sharp No price rise, creating a notable though not elite conviction signal.
- The market saw a 171x spike versus its historical trading volume, while No rose 27% as money entered.
- This trader added $2,022 to an existing No position worth $5,397, signaling increased conviction rather than routine profit-taking.
- The wallet has resolved 390 trades with a 66% win rate and has traded across 69 markets.
$2,150 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Serial trader scaling into No
A serial cross-market trader added $2,022 to an existing No position amid a 171x volume spike and a sharp No price rise, creating a notable though not elite conviction signal.
- The market saw a 171x spike versus its historical trading volume, while No rose 27% as money entered.
- This trader added $2,022 to an existing No position worth $5,397, signaling increased conviction rather than routine profit-taking.
- The wallet has resolved 390 trades with a 66% win rate and has traded across 69 markets.
$2,022 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Whale buying Yes quietly
A repeat-flagged wallet effectively bought about $69k of Yes at ~16¢, over 16x recent 24h volume on a quiet long-dated geopolitical market, though its resolved track record is not strong.
- A single wallet put $69k toward Yes, more than 16x the market’s recent 24h volume.
- The trade is effectively buying Yes around 16¢, a low-probability entry with large upside if risk rises.
- This wallet has been flagged 5 times before, but its resolved record is limited at 4 wins and 6 losses.
$5,000 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 40%
Repeat whale buying NO
A repeat large bettor is putting $70k back into the No side on a geopolitical market, a meaningful size relative to recent activity despite an unproven track record.
- This wallet put $70k on No, a large re-entry after previously holding an $82.9k No position.
- The bet was much larger than recent market activity, suggesting strong conviction on a quiet order flow window.
- The wallet is only modestly profitable so far, but this is a concentrated macro bet at an 84¢ entry.
$3,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 40%
Repeat whale buying NO
A repeat large bettor is putting $70k back into the No side on a geopolitical market, a meaningful size relative to recent activity despite an unproven track record.
- This wallet put $70k on No, a large re-entry after previously holding an $82.9k No position.
- The bet was much larger than recent market activity, suggesting strong conviction on a quiet order flow window.
- The wallet is only modestly profitable so far, but this is a concentrated macro bet at an 84¢ entry.
$1,199 on No | Wallet win rate: 40%
Repeat whale buying NO
A repeat large bettor is putting $70k back into the No side on a geopolitical market, a meaningful size relative to recent activity despite an unproven track record.
- This wallet put $70k on No, a large re-entry after previously holding an $82.9k No position.
- The bet was much larger than recent market activity, suggesting strong conviction on a quiet order flow window.
- The wallet is only modestly profitable so far, but this is a concentrated macro bet at an 84¢ entry.
$2,500 on No | Wallet win rate: 40%
Repeat whale buying NO
A repeat large bettor is putting $70k back into the No side on a geopolitical market, a meaningful size relative to recent activity despite an unproven track record.
- This wallet put $70k on No, a large re-entry after previously holding an $82.9k No position.
- The bet was much larger than recent market activity, suggesting strong conviction on a quiet order flow window.
- The wallet is only modestly profitable so far, but this is a concentrated macro bet at an 84¢ entry.
$2,000 on No | Wallet win rate: 40%
Repeat whale buying NO
A repeat large bettor is putting $70k back into the No side on a geopolitical market, a meaningful size relative to recent activity despite an unproven track record.
- This wallet put $70k on No, a large re-entry after previously holding an $82.9k No position.
- The bet was much larger than recent market activity, suggesting strong conviction on a quiet order flow window.
- The wallet is only modestly profitable so far, but this is a concentrated macro bet at an 84¢ entry.
$1,496 on No | Wallet win rate: 40%
Top Holders
- 0xa4c3...bbb2 — No, $246,709 (48% win rate)
- 0xb723...0065 — No, $233,267 (88% win rate)
- 0xc3c3...eec8 — Yes, $198,023 (99% win rate)
- 0xbc81...4fad — Yes, $56,758
- 0xb886...81b3 — Yes, $54,280 (53% win rate)
- 0x11fc...dc48 — No, $53,897 (55% win rate)
- 0x6db9...4ab5 — Yes, $53,054 (81% win rate)
- 0xac29...36c7 — Yes, $52,513
- 0xdd1d...bbf0 — No, $46,332 (85% win rate)
- 0xcfeb...3365 — Yes, $40,000 (82% win rate)
Related Theses
CF América will not win
Covers 1 related market
PAOK will win on August 13
Covers 1 related market
Vasco-Olimpia will be low-scoring
Covers 1 related market
Ceasefire comes after July 31
Covers 2 related markets
Switzerland Algeria stays low scoring
Covers 1 related market
Spain wins by two-plus
Covers 1 related market
Spain wins 2026 World Cup
Covers 1 related market
China will invade Taiwan by 2027
Covers 1 related market
Croatia wins by multiple goals
Covers 1 related market
Haiti keeps high-scoring match close
Covers 2 related markets
