Part of: US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by…?
US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by August 18, 2026?
This prediction market asks whether the United States and Iran will mutually sign or adopt a qualifying written diplomatic instrument for a final nuclear deal by August 18, 2026. Current live odds may move as negotiations develop; PolySpotter is tracking $1,750 in smart money and 1 signal on this market.
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
7 smart money signals detected, totaling $36,465.
Categories: Iran, Geopolitics, US-Iran, Peace Deal, Middle East, Iran Ceasefire
Notable Trades
Profitable 76% cross-market bettor
Surfaced because the wallet has a long profitable track record and is taking a cross-market No position on the US-Iran deal outcome.
- This bettor wins 76% of resolved trades and is up $22.4K lifetime.
- They are positioning across 2 related markets, suggesting a broader No thesis.
- Buying No at 80¢ means they are backing the market’s favorite side with a proven track record.
$1,750 on No | Wallet win rate: 76%
Profitable serial macro bettor
Profitable serial cross-market trader placed a $7.9k No bet amid an 11.8x volume spike on a geopolitically significant market.
- This bettor has a long record: 997 resolved trades, 68% wins, and about $202k in profit.
- They are a serial cross-market trader across 46 events, suggesting a repeatable event-based strategy rather than a one-off bet.
- The $7.9k No buy came during an 11.8x volume spike, adding momentum behind the same thesis.
$1,200 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Profitable serial macro bettor
Profitable serial cross-market trader placed a $7.9k No bet amid an 11.8x volume spike on a geopolitically significant market.
- This bettor has a long record: 997 resolved trades, 68% wins, and about $202k in profit.
- They are a serial cross-market trader across 46 events, suggesting a repeatable event-based strategy rather than a one-off bet.
- The $7.9k No buy came during an 11.8x volume spike, adding momentum behind the same thesis.
$1,757 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Profitable serial macro bettor
Profitable serial cross-market trader placed a $7.9k No bet amid an 11.8x volume spike on a geopolitically significant market.
- This bettor has a long record: 997 resolved trades, 68% wins, and about $202k in profit.
- They are a serial cross-market trader across 46 events, suggesting a repeatable event-based strategy rather than a one-off bet.
- The $7.9k No buy came during an 11.8x volume spike, adding momentum behind the same thesis.
$3,950 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Profitable cross-market political bettor
A profitable high-volume political bettor with a 77% long-run win rate is taking a cross-market No position on the Iran nuclear deal event.
- This bettor has won 77% of 1,193 resolved trades and is up about $70.9K lifetime.
- They are positioning across 2 related markets in the same event, suggesting a broader thesis.
- Buying No at 79¢ implies they see the final deal as unlikely despite active diplomatic headlines.
$3,950 on No | Wallet win rate: 77%
Profitable serial macro bettor
Profitable serial cross-market trader placed a $7.9k No bet amid an 11.8x volume spike on a geopolitically significant market.
- This bettor has a long record: 997 resolved trades, 68% wins, and about $202k in profit.
- They are a serial cross-market trader across 46 events, suggesting a repeatable event-based strategy rather than a one-off bet.
- The $7.9k No buy came during an 11.8x volume spike, adding momentum behind the same thesis.
$7,900 on No | Wallet win rate: 69%
Profitable serial macro bettor
Sharp, highly profitable serial cross-market bettor bought $16k of Yes at 19¢ on a geopolitical market where informed positioning is plausible.
- This bettor wins 80% of resolved trades and is up $3.86M lifetime.
- They have traded 233 markets across 144 events, suggesting a broad repeatable edge rather than a one-off bet.
- They bought $16k of Yes at 19¢, below the current 22¢ market price.
$15,959 on Yes | Wallet win rate: 79%
Top Holders
- 0xde7b...5f4b — Yes, $185,230 (79% win rate)
- 0x7e5e...7315 — No, $46,852 (54% win rate)
- 0x53e5...6177 — No, $35,000 (43% win rate)
- 0x0845...6b6f — No, $29,711 (69% win rate)
- 0xb51b...b4d9 — No, $19,534 (61% win rate)
- 0xcaab...24dd — No, $15,000 (77% win rate)
- 0xc8ab...6418 — No, $12,168 (47% win rate)
- 0x6e37...2849 — No, $9,375
- 0xe472...e7eb — No, $5,600 (82% win rate)
- 0x24c8...23e1 — Yes, $5,066 (39% win rate)
Related Theses
Iran closes airspace mid-May
Covers 4 related markets
Iran deal in early June
Covers 9 related markets
US-Iran peace deal coming
Covers 9 related markets
Iran ceasefire collapses by June
Covers 6 related markets
Uranium handover by June
Covers 2 related markets
Iran deal announced by May
Covers 7 related markets
