Part of: US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by…?
US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by December 31, 2026?
This Polymarket market asks whether the United States and Iran will sign or adopt a qualifying written diplomatic instrument covering Iran’s nuclear program and other topics by December 31, 2026. Current price odds were not provided in the market metadata; PolySpotter tracks $178,574 in smart-money activity across one reported signal, including notable No-side whale and macro-trader activity. The listed market resolution date is September 30, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET.
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
13 smart money signals detected, totaling $379,853.
Categories: Iran, Geopolitics, US-Iran, Peace Deal, Middle East, Iran Ceasefire
Notable Trades
Whale scaling into No
A profitable serial cross-market trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position while committing $243,173 across four related markets.
- This trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position, bringing total investment in it to about $117,000.
- The wallet has traded across 31 events and 110 markets, with $1.17 million in tracked volume and nearly $1.95 million in lifetime profit.
- The trader has committed $243,173 across four markets tied to this event, signaling a concentrated view against a final deal.
$178,574 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Whale scaling into No
A profitable serial cross-market trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position while committing $243,173 across four related markets.
- This trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position, bringing total investment in it to about $117,000.
- The wallet has traded across 31 events and 110 markets, with $1.17 million in tracked volume and nearly $1.95 million in lifetime profit.
- The trader has committed $243,173 across four markets tied to this event, signaling a concentrated view against a final deal.
$42,027 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Whale scaling into No
A profitable serial cross-market trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position while committing $243,173 across four related markets.
- This trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position, bringing total investment in it to about $117,000.
- The wallet has traded across 31 events and 110 markets, with $1.17 million in tracked volume and nearly $1.95 million in lifetime profit.
- The trader has committed $243,173 across four markets tied to this event, signaling a concentrated view against a final deal.
$3,539 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Whale scaling into No
A profitable serial cross-market trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position while committing $243,173 across four related markets.
- This trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position, bringing total investment in it to about $117,000.
- The wallet has traded across 31 events and 110 markets, with $1.17 million in tracked volume and nearly $1.95 million in lifetime profit.
- The trader has committed $243,173 across four markets tied to this event, signaling a concentrated view against a final deal.
$1,562 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Three-wallet No conviction cluster
Three substantial trades align on No amid a 20.6x volume spike, though much of the flow reflects existing positions rather than fresh conviction.
- Three wallets put $11,466 behind No, including a fresh $4,500 purchase at 75¢.
- Trading activity was 20.6 times the historical average, adding weight to the coordinated move.
- Several Yes sells appear to be position exits, so the signal is meaningful but not a clean new bet from every wallet.
$11,466 on No
Profitable whale-led Yes cluster
Three wallets aligned on Yes, including a highly profitable large-scale trader adding to an existing position as odds rose 4.5% in a day.
- Three wallets put $8,635 behind Yes, with the No sale equivalent to an additional Yes purchase around 34¢.
- The largest bettor has won 64% of 1,003 resolved bets and is up $1.08 million lifetime.
- Yes recently rose 4.5% in one day, while the lead wallet increased an already substantial position near 33¢.
$8,635 on Yes
Profitable serial macro trader
Proven high-volume political trader with $1.0M lifetime profit is buying nearly $60k of No while also positioning across related US-Iran markets.
- This bettor has a long track record: 64% wins across 990 resolved bets and over $1.0M in profit.
- They bought nearly $60k of No, a large conviction trade in a market with only $128k traded in the last day.
- The same wallet is active across 3 related markets with $460k positioned, suggesting a broader US-Iran thesis.
$5,810 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
94% win-rate macro bettor buys No
A highly experienced trader with a 94% win rate and substantial verified profits is making a fresh $8.6K bet on No at 71%.
- This bettor has won 94% of 282 resolved positions and is up more than $1 million.
- The trader is putting $8,614 behind No at 71%, despite the market pricing No at 72%.
- With activity across 437 markets and 342 events, this is a proven serial trader rather than a one-off bet.
$8,614 on No | Wallet win rate: 92%
Whale scaling into No
A profitable serial cross-market trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position while committing $243,173 across four related markets.
- This trader is adding $48,139 to an existing No position, bringing total investment in it to about $117,000.
- The wallet has traded across 31 events and 110 markets, with $1.17 million in tracked volume and nearly $1.95 million in lifetime profit.
- The trader has committed $243,173 across four markets tied to this event, signaling a concentrated view against a final deal.
$48,139 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Profitable serial macro trader
Proven high-volume political trader with $1.0M lifetime profit is buying nearly $60k of No while also positioning across related US-Iran markets.
- This bettor has a long track record: 64% wins across 990 resolved bets and over $1.0M in profit.
- They bought nearly $60k of No, a large conviction trade in a market with only $128k traded in the last day.
- The same wallet is active across 3 related markets with $460k positioned, suggesting a broader US-Iran thesis.
$7,199 on No | Wallet win rate: 64%
Top Holders
- 0x0c0e...434e — No, $479,810 (64% win rate)
- 0xde7b...5f4b — Yes, $100,000 (80% win rate)
- 0x1681...b1c7 — Yes, $86,081 (69% win rate)
- 0xbaa2...2c73 — Yes, $56,175 (64% win rate)
- 0x162f...798d — Yes, $50,376 (67% win rate)
- 0xce1d...1b9b — Yes, $45,000 (61% win rate)
- 0xde5a...2251 — Yes, $43,063
- 0x2e0b...8070 — No, $33,665 (88% win rate)
- 0xb1ca...1705 — No, $30,000 (57% win rate)
- 0xc8ab...6418 — No, $26,111 (48% win rate)
Related Theses
Argentina won’t win; others favored
Covers 7 related markets
Fed holds rates steady
Covers 2 related markets
Thunder win low-scoring rout
Covers 3 related markets
Thunder cover low-scoring game
Covers 3 related markets
No Iran peace deal
Covers 3 related markets
Knicks win low-scoring game
Covers 3 related markets
Spurs win close defensive game
Covers 3 related markets
France wins comfortably, clean sheet
Covers 3 related markets
England wins high-scoring match
Covers 3 related markets
